Originally posted by AThousandYoungA foreigner has no "right" in a country he visits...oh naive one!
Allowing someone to fund raise is not supporting them. It's letting them exercise their freedom.
As example: Hop a plane to Saudi Arabia and hold a fund raiser for your favorite atheist charity. Oh, one thing before you go...let me know where to send the flowers. 🙂
Originally posted by MacSwainYou are mistaken. All people have inalienable rights. Some places suppress those rights but the US tries to be better than that.
A foreigner has no "right" in a country he visits...oh naive one!
As example: Hop a plane to Saudi Arabia and hold a fund raiser for your favorite atheist charity. Oh, one thing before you go...let me know where to send the flowers. 🙂
Originally posted by AThousandYoungMy post said:
Are you able to answer the question?
o "I cannot remember a post in this forum by capitalists that the source was not attacked by the communists."
o Then you ask me.."Have I done that."
o I answered with--"Are you a communist?"
o Then you stupidly ask--"Are you able to answer the question?"
I did answer with "Are you a communist". If you can't understand the linkage it will take pictures..doh!
Originally posted by AThousandYoungMY ORIGINAL POST:
You have any evidence for that claim?
"As info..This news has not reached Berkley yet: All foreign embasies have resident intelligence people on staff. ALL embasies..even in friendly countries."
If you propose that intelligence officers are sent to other countries foreign embasies for...hmm vacations, travel study, R&R, or whatever you chose to be the reason - PLEASE SHOW EVIDENCE.
Personally, I hold these truths to be self evident. No country is so callous with the expenditure of funds to provide travel and expenses for staff in a foreign land for "no benefit" and since intelligence officers' skill is to collect intelligence and conduct nefarious operations, they are not there to collect butterflies.
Originally posted by abejnoodWhat do you think the US should do instead regarding Iraq and Iran in order to stay a world power ?
So the U.S. has recently claimed they are putting 50 billion to industrialize Iraq. This spells doom for Iran and the ultimate, final success for the U.S. A good thing? Depends on who you are. Not if you're Iran, obviously. Who else? Unfortunately, many don't realize that Iran's demise will also spell doom for many countries. The U.S.'s "greatest threat", o ideals that founded America, before the U.S. becomes the next Empire to rule and fall.
Originally posted by MacSwainA question is not an answer to a question.
My post said:
o "I cannot remember a post in this forum by capitalists that the source was not attacked by the communists."
o Then you ask me.."Have I done that."
o I answered with--"Are you a communist?"
o Then you stupidly ask--"Are you able to answer the question?"
I did answer with "Are you a communist". If you can't understand the linkage it will take pictures..doh!
Originally posted by MacSwain"Everyone does it - I'm sure of it, though I can't prove it - so it's ok if I do it."
MY ORIGINAL POST:
"As info..This news has not reached Berkley yet: All foreign embasies have resident intelligence people on staff. ALL embasies..even in friendly countries."
If you propose that intelligence officers are sent to other countries foreign embasies for...hmm vacations, travel study, R&R, or whatever you chose to be the reason - PLEASE SHOW ...[text shortened]... t intelligence and conduct nefarious operations, they are not there to collect butterflies.
Uh...ok...
Originally posted by ivanhoeThe US doesn't have to do anything to stay a world power. We are THE world power and nothing's going to change that any time soon. Meddling in the Middle East or not won't change that.
What do you think the US should do instead regarding Iraq and Iran in order to stay a world power ?