Debates
04 Apr 11
Originally posted by PalynkaThat's just how science bubbles over into politics. Nothing to be done, I fear. But at least the article indicates that oxytocin may be implicated in 'love' and 'hate' and of course there's the in/outgroup thing which could just possibly be relevant to this topic. Also, perhaps, it shows that the biology of love/hate is not fully understood, leaving those who argue in terms of 'religions of hate' on shaky ground.
Lots of over-interpretation going on there. As usual, the scientific reporter feels at liberty to claim a lot more than the scientists he's reporting on.
Originally posted by Bosse de NageBut none of that excuses people like Trump, does it?
That's just how science bubbles over into politics. Nothing to be done, I fear. But at least the article indicates that oxytocin may be implicated in 'love' and 'hate' and of course there's the in/outgroup thing which could just possibly be relevant to this topic. Also, perhaps, it shows that the biology of love/hate is not fully understood, leaving those who argue in terms of 'religions of hate' on shaky ground.
Unless you're a strict adherent to genetic determinism (which seems a pretty outdated view) then the physiology of hate has little bearing on whether we should accept such extreme positions.
Originally posted by PalynkaThese are certainly questions which KN may have failed to consider in his rush to provide the thread with a healthy dose of his idiosyncratically inane and frivolous denunciations of religion.
That's a bit delusional. How can they hate something they don't think exists? Do you hate various supernatural beings?