- Joined
- 08 Dec 04
- Moves
- 100919
Originally posted by KazetNagorraI don't believe the slanted site covering your comment. If he didn't agree with the Constitution, why would he nominate Gorsuch, a Constitutionalist to the Supreme Court?
What's your take on Donald Trump calling the U.S. political system "archaic"? Do you have an opinion on this issue at all?
His actions speak louder than left wing web sites spinning a story to make him look bad.
Originally posted by checkbaiterHaha. Fox News is now a left wing story spinner?
I don't believe the slanted site covering your comment. If he didn't agree with the Constitution, why would he nominate Gorsuch, a Constitutionalist to the Supreme Court?
His actions speak louder than left wing web sites spinning a story to make him look bad.
01 May 17
Originally posted by checkbaiterDonald Trump rubber-stamped his nomination for the Supreme Court because someone convinced him he was the right choice for the job.
I don't believe the slanted site covering your comment. If he didn't agree with the Constitution, why would he nominate Gorsuch, a Constitutionalist to the Supreme Court?
His actions speak louder than left wing web sites spinning a story to make him look bad.
Do Donald Trump's actions speak louder than his own words as aired by Fox News?
Originally posted by checkbaiterThe only "bulls**t" here is this article.
"The deceptively named American Civil Liberties Union has a spotty record at best in protecting our Constitutional rights. They don’t believe the 2nd Amendment guarantees our right to own firearms, but if a person born with a penis wants to pee in the women's bathroom, they are all over it. Continuing this selective interpretation of civil rights, the AC ...[text shortened]... 10, 2016 - Brian C. Anderson
I like this much better....
http://firstliberty.org/about-us/
Originally posted by checkbaiterA "Constitutionalist"?
I don't believe the slanted site covering your comment. If he didn't agree with the Constitution, why would he nominate Gorsuch, a Constitutionalist to the Supreme Court?
His actions speak louder than left wing web sites spinning a story to make him look bad.
Supporting the top 1% is now in the Constitution? Not yet, it isn't.
02 May 17
Originally posted by PhrannyWell-said.
Excuse me. I am a member of OFA and have been since it's beginning. Those attending our local gatherings/meetings are teachers, doctors, retired professionals, working professionals... all liberal, progressive, patriotic citizens deeply concerned about the fascist direction Trump and the GOP is leading the country. Interesting how you find it is perfectly ...[text shortened]... mind set. I'm interested in knowing what you think of the ACLU, American Civil Liberties Union.
03 May 17
Originally posted by KazetNagorraDon't you think such a lie would be rather easy to detect?
So you claim that The Guardian is making up that Donald Trump said the system is "archaic" during an interview with Fox News? Don't you think such a lie would be rather easy to detect?
[youtube]TcdgMSoFc4Y[/youtube]
lol, well yes one would have thought so.
03 May 17
Originally posted by checkbaiterThat is democracy.
http://patriotsforamerica.ning.com/forum/topics/what-you-should-know-about-ofa
I do not understand how living in a country with its democracy established over 200 years ago, and for the first time in history , suddenly we have one of our former presidents set up a group called "Organizing for Action", (OFA) 30,000 strong working to disrupt every thin ...[text shortened]... ommunity organizing project that advocates for the agenda of former U.S. President Barack Obama.
Organizing and direct action.
Unions, political parties, NRA, lobby groups...
It's not just bosses and the rich who have the right to lobby.
And paying politicians isn't the only method of advancing change within a democracy.