@sonhouse saidSmarter? Suzy has a crush on him, too. But I have the same education and aint THINKIN about writing in all that prose fun. You can fall for it, but I like to banter in plain English. I did my forty-something years, put it behind me. He writes real pretty, and as a lawyer, I suspect he has a paralegal working the scene!! He has NEVER said anything tongue in cheek, jest, humorous, self-deprecating, good-ole-boy, ...add a few more friendly attributes, you get my drift. really strange, I figure him as a creation of some computer nerds that they programmed to mess with us!!
@AverageJoe1
#1 is over 2100, not 1800. My guess is he makes more than you. BESIDES being about ten time smarter.
He won't read this, will he 🤔 ?
@beowulf saidI.e., could you believe his 'essence of government 'post. I never really new (oh god I misspelled Knew) any lawyers that talk like that. But that aside, why cant this be fun and not like going to Marauder 101 every morning for class? If he is so smart where are his comments on the horribleness of our Biden Nation? NOT ONE!!! So, he is , well, what is he? Let's do a Marauder thread. No need to do one on me, I call the truth, and do not cl]ouch my words or blow smoke.
See above post about his rating.
And No1 ain't no lawyer.
Probably a para legal or something.
11 Jul 22
@AverageJoe1
The worst part is the Republicans win the midterms and the next presidential election and we have to hear the Democrats complain forever 😔
Scary.
11 Jul 22
@averagejoe1 saidIF he were for real, he would respond to the slam on Mott 'not understanding political' stuff and admit he was wrong. You saw it, he said that the Justices understand it, but Mott does not understand it, when Mott reached the same conclusion as did the justices. Just say "you got me!!" I have done that often. You know, Marauder, there is a saying in the profession , "If you aint lost any, you aint tried many." Let it go man, you will be happier.
I.e., could you believe his 'essence of government 'post. I never really new (oh god I misspelled Knew) any lawyers that talk like that. But that aside, why cant this be fun and not like going to Marauder 101 every morning for class? If he is so smart where are his comments on the horribleness of our Biden Nation? NOT ONE!!! So, he is , well, what is he? Let's do a ...[text shortened]... uder thread. No need to do one on me, I call the truth, and do not cl]ouch my words or blow smoke.
12 Jul 22
@Beowulf
I wonder what you all will think when we actually lose our democracy and the new authoritarian basturds take over permanently?
The dark days in the US have just STARTED kicking up steam, but I guess that's what you repub zombies WANT is the end to democracy, to you, a useless ancient concept with no room in the 'modern' world.
12 Jul 22
@sonhouse saidI do not understand your post, as I do not know what you mean by 'democracy'. What do you mean when you say democracy?
@Beowulf
I wonder what you all will think when we actually lose our democracy and the new authoritarian basturds take over permanently?
The dark days in the US have just STARTED kicking up steam, but I guess that's what you repub zombies WANT is the end to democracy, to you, a useless ancient concept with no room in the 'modern' world.
12 Jul 22
@averagejoe1 saidMott's in another thread insisting that States give you rights.
IF he were for real, he would respond to the slam on Mott 'not understanding political' stuff and admit he was wrong. You saw it, he said that the Justices understand it, but Mott does not understand it, when Mott reached the same conclusion as did the justices. Just say "you got me!!" I have done that often. You know, Marauder, there is a saying in the profession , "If you aint lost any, you aint tried many." Let it go man, you will be happier.
Nothing could be further from the Founders and Framers' belief in inalienable rights.
12 Jul 22
@no1marauder saidPlease distinguish, as Mott says rights, and you, in liberal-eze, say inalienable rights. Changes his comment, does it?
Mott's in another thread insisting that States give you rights.
Nothing could be further from the Founders and Framers' belief in inalienable rights.
- Joined
- 27 Sep 06
- Moves
- 251103
12 Jul 22
@averagejoe1 saidHe certainly is better informed.
Smarter? Suzy has a crush on him, too. But I have the same education and aint THINKIN about writing in all that prose fun. You can fall for it, but I like to banter in plain English. I did my forty-something years, put it behind me. He writes real pretty, and as a lawyer, I suspect he has a paralegal working the scene!! He has NEVER said anything tongue in cheek, jest, ...[text shortened]... n of some computer nerds that they programmed to mess with us!!
He won't read this, will he 🤔 ?
@averagejoe1 saidThe Framers apparently talked "in liberal -eze".
Please distinguish, as Mott says rights, and you, in liberal-eze, say inalienable rights. Changes his comment, does it?
Any right is inalienable or it isn't a right.
12 Jul 22
@averagejoe1 saidAnd you lie like Trump.
I.e., could you believe his 'essence of government 'post. I never really new (oh god I misspelled Knew) any lawyers that talk like that. But that aside, why cant this be fun and not like going to Marauder 101 every morning for class? If he is so smart where are his comments on the horribleness of our Biden Nation? NOT ONE!!! So, he is , well, what is he? Let's do a ...[text shortened]... uder thread. No need to do one on me, I call the truth, and do not cl]ouch my words or blow smoke.
12 Jul 22
@jimm619 saidNo question about that. Give him 5 informed gold stars. I played an enjoyable, healthful, round of golf today instead of researching, myself. Gonna do it tomorrow, too. I've noticed the Jimmmmperson has been doing his share of googling, himself . He may be like Marauder in 100 years.
He certainly is better informed.
OH! You ARE that person.