Debates
13 Mar 04
14 Mar 04
Originally posted by StarValleyWyOk, i would stop funding Apathide in Israel. I would use my countries massive influence in that part of the world to allow Palestinians to live there lives, in FREDOM and LIBERTY, free from TERROR.
If i could I would kill every coward who kills innocent's. Yes. Bin Laden is counting on folks like you.
Tell me what you would do to gain their respect? How would you open a dialogue and what would you say to get the conversation going? I am mighty interested in hearing it.
Again you wranckle about us already having "bombed his ass once". Did ...[text shortened]... back? I really am curious about that. Why in the world are you supporting him so ... vehemently?
Fundamentalism has grown as a backlash to this regime!! Saddam doesn't come close to the genocide inflicted by the Jews, payed for by the US dollar. Through Israel, America has been dicriminating against the Arabs for decades.
14 Mar 04
Originally posted by marinakatombTry to concentrate. Stop trying to change the subject. It works with children, but not with adults. I'm not interested in your anti-semitic ramblings. I just want to know if you want Saddam back.
Ok, i would stop funding Apathide in Israel. I would use my countries massive influence in that part of the world to allow Palestinians to live there lives, in FREDOM and LIBERTY, free from TERROR.
Fundamentalism has grown as a backlash to this regime!! Saddam doesn't come close to the genocide inflicted by the Jews, payed for by the US dollar. Through Israel, America has been dicriminating against the Arabs for decades.
Do you want Saddam back? yes or no? Again, try to concentrate. You can do it if you try.
14 Mar 04
1 edit
Originally posted by marinakatombSo he's not a terrorist. There is your answer and mine.
he's just not a terrorist. He is a dictator.
I KNOW HE IS A TERRORIST AND YOU KNOW HE ISN'T A TERRORIST.
Isn't life simple when you communicate. Why don't you think he is a terrorist. Support him as a good guy. This is more like it. A good conversation. Give me your top two reasons to support your premise that he isn't a terroist. I give as mine the four wars he has personally willed on the world.
14 Mar 04
Originally posted by garyminfordSame challenge to you. Give me your top two reasons why he is not a terrorist. Or was he a terrorist? He either was or wasn't. True? Is there a middle state of being? Maybe something like "Dickerist"... contraction of Dictator and Terroist, maybe?
Truly, mind-numbingly pathetic. 😕
In any case, you MIGHT in a million years win the argument that Saddam was just a "Dictator". Then all you have to do is defend that as worth preserving.
14 Mar 04
Originally posted by StarValleyWyI am not questioning wether or not he was a terrorist. I was refering to your post where you stated that marinakatomb wanted Saddam back, and that he supported terrorism. That is simply not the case.
Same challenge to you. Give me your top two reasons why he is not a terrorist. Or was he a terrorist? He either was or wasn't. True? Is there a middle state of being? Maybe something like "Dickerist"... contraction of Dictator and Terroist, maybe?
In any case, you MIGHT in a million years win the argument that Saddam was just a "Dictator". Then all you have to do is defend that as worth preserving.
14 Mar 04
Originally posted by marinakatombLet me try again. My first response was deleted by the monitors who seem to be quite upset with my ideas. I guess they have that right. They should just have the courage to explain to me why they are deleting totally good posts. It is irritating to have only part of the argument ... theirs, or it's... presented by you. I am getting cheated here.
Please outline the part were i defended terrorists.
.
.
.
.
.
.............No, i don't think so.
Just because i am not sturred by bold statements about "Terror" and "Freedom" and "Liberty", doesn't make me sympathetic to terrorists.
When my country takes military action, where thousands and thousands of people will be killed by a ra ...[text shortened]... to do with the US's war on Terror, it has everything to do with Saddams war on Iraq!
Anyway, the point I think is valid is that I BELIEVE Saddam was a terrorist. You say we should not have removed him. In my tiny little brain, that means you support him? Is that acceptable? Might censuring overseers of thought?
14 Mar 04
Originally posted by slimjimWho did he harbor?
Saddam was a terrorist. He harbored terrorists in his country.ðŸ˜
You're getting confused. Perhaps this is because your country is fighting so many wars it is easier to just define anyone that fights against you, or disagrees with your fascist president, as a terrorist.