Go back
The UN and the world today

The UN and the world today

Debates

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
11 Aug 17
1 edit

Looking at all the "not spots" in the world today, how much of it should be blamed on past decisions from the UN?

For example, Israel was created by the UN. It has been a hot bed ever since. The UN voted to go to war in Korea and now the world is looking at nuclear war today, the UN voted to go to war in Libya and now ISIS has a firm foothold in that country, etc.

Has the UN been a complete failure? Has it only achieved the exact opposite of its intent?

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
11 Aug 17

Was the resolution to go to war in Korea and Libya a correct one?

sh76
Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
Clock
11 Aug 17

The UN is fine as a forum for dialogue and for organization of humanitarian activities.

For security, the UN has proven itself irrelevant over and over again.

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669955
Clock
11 Aug 17
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

The UN is suffering form a principal error in ist structure: the Veto in the security council. As long as five states have the power to block anything there won't be a high Impact.

That Israel is what it is today is thanks to the US Veto.
The Korean war was only brought Forward, since Russia didn't vote.
The Lybia conflict was a desaster insofar as no specific plan for a post-Gaddafi time was envisaged. Plus the nonsensical frontiers drawn by colonial powers are deemed sacrosanct. Had Lyvia been distributed in roughly three parts: Cyrenaika in the North east, Lybia in the North west and Tuareg in the south a lot what we see today wouldn't have occured. Africa suffers from too big "nations" with artificial frontiers.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
11 Aug 17

Originally posted by @whodey
Looking at all the "not spots" in the world today, how much of it should be blamed on past decisions from the UN?

For example, Israel was created by the UN. It has been a hot bed ever since. The UN voted to go to war in Korea and now the world is looking at nuclear war today, the UN voted to go to war in Libya and now ISIS has a firm foothold in that co ...[text shortened]...

Has the UN been a complete failure? Has it only achieved the exact opposite of its intent?
Israel was not "created by the UN" and the UN did not "vote to go to war" in Korea or Libya.

Anything else I need to clear up about the UN?

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
11 Aug 17

Originally posted by @kazetnagorra
Israel was not "created by the UN" and the UN did not "vote to go to war" in Korea or Libya.

Anything else I need to clear up about the UN?
I see, so the UN had next to nothing to do with the creation of Israel and Korea was not really a war.

Got it! Thanks for that. 😵

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
11 Aug 17
1 edit

Originally posted by @ponderable
The UN is suffering form a principal error in ist structure: the Veto in the security council. As long as five states have the power to block anything there won't be a high Impact.

That Israel is what it is today is thanks to the US Veto.
The Korean war was only brought Forward, since Russia didn't vote.
The Lybia conflict was a desaster insofar as ...[text shortened]... ee today wouldn't have occured. Africa suffers from too big "nations" with artificial frontiers.
So the war in Libya was justifiable and would have worked if only they had redistributed the country correctly?

Why was it justifiable?

Ponderable
chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
669955
Clock
11 Aug 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @whodey
So the war in Libya was justifiable and would have worked if only they had redistributed the country correctly?

Why was it justifiable?
What I said was that the ensuing chaos came from bad planing.
The existence of strongmen, tyrants or whatever you call them is a direct consequence of colonial heritage.

There had been a civil war in Libya before so called coalition participated.

What are your criteria about a war? Then we can clear that up. whose participation was justified by what would be the interesting question. (Was the war bewteen the Union and the CSA justified? Was the cessetion justified who was the agressor? What measures to avoid a war, what war to avoid unjustness are there?)

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
11 Aug 17
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @ponderable
What I said was that the ensuing chaos came from bad planing.
The existence of strongmen, tyrants or whatever you call them is a direct consequence of colonial heritage.

There had been a civil war in Libya before so called coalition participated.

What are your criteria about a war? Then we can clear that up. whose participation was justified by w ...[text shortened]... ied who was the agressor? What measures to avoid a war, what war to avoid unjustness are there?)
When is war justified? That is what I'm; asking you, for you see, I'm not an enlightened Prog like Obama. I was hoping you could learn me.

When does war not create chaos? Every war creates chaos.

All I would add is, when you go to war expect chaos, as well as insurgencies for at least a decade, like what happened after WW2 in Nazi Germany, so plan to stay and see it through unlike when Obama left Iraq and ISIS took over.

Also, plan to actually win instead of fostering a growing cancer like North Korea and Iran.

no1marauder
Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
Clock
11 Aug 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @whodey
Looking at all the "not spots" in the world today, how much of it should be blamed on past decisions from the UN?

For example, Israel was created by the UN. It has been a hot bed ever since. The UN voted to go to war in Korea and now the world is looking at nuclear war today, the UN voted to go to war in Libya and now ISIS has a firm foothold in that co ...[text shortened]...

Has the UN been a complete failure? Has it only achieved the exact opposite of its intent?
Israel was not "created by the UN". It was created by war.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
11 Aug 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @whodey
I see, so the UN had next to nothing to do with the creation of Israel and Korea was not really a war.

Got it! Thanks for that. 😵
I recommend a reading comprehension course.

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
11 Aug 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @no1marauder
Israel was not "created by the UN". It was created by war.
I see, so UN resolution 181 that created the Zionist state then led to a quick war to create the nation of Israel we have today? Is this your argument?

D

Joined
08 Jun 07
Moves
2120
Clock
11 Aug 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
11 Aug 17
2 edits

The post that was quoted here has been removed
I don't really care how far back you go. All I want is to hold accountable those who seemingly just want to sit back and blame the orange man for everything wrong in the world even though he has been in office less than a year instead of owning up to their short comings.

The UN is and has been a train wreck. In fact, it has been more destructive than anything

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26757
Clock
11 Aug 17
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by @ponderable
The UN is suffering form a principal error in ist structure: the Veto in the security council. As long as five states have the power to block anything there won't be a high Impact.

That Israel is what it is today is thanks to the US Veto.
The Korean war was only brought Forward, since Russia didn't vote.
The Lybia conflict was a desaster insofar as ...[text shortened]... ee today wouldn't have occured. Africa suffers from too big "nations" with artificial frontiers.
The UN veto is why we haven't yet had WWIII.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.