@no1marauder saidLazare pointed out:
RT news says so anyway.
Anyone who actually reads the Court's Order (https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6185644/Sealed-Order.pdf) knows the claims in the article are false; the Court hardly denied that there was a Russian government attempt to influence the election in Trump's favor - it merely ruled that prosecutors shouldn't have made certain public statement ...[text shortened]... particular defendants. It did not dismiss the case because of this or even sanction the prosecutors.
“Americans assume that Russians and Russia are the same thing. But they’re not, any more than an individual American and the Trump administration are the same thing,” he told RT.
Aaron Mate is an outstanding journalist who rarely gets facts wrong. I stand by his assertions in the article I posted. Mueller's implied link between IRA & Russian gov't was false.
@metal-brain saidAaron Mate either can't read or is a purveyor of falsehoods IF he thinks that Judge's Order in any way supports the claims he makes in the article.
Lazare pointed out:
“Americans assume that Russians and Russia are the same thing. But they’re not, any more than an individual American and the Trump administration are the same thing,” he told RT.
Aaron Mate is an outstanding journalist who rarely gets facts wrong. I stand by his assertions in the article I posted. Mueller's implied link between IRA & Russian gov't was false.
@metal-brain saidNo. It hasn't.
Yes it has, in about every way possible.
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/07/no_author/another-nail-in-russiagate-coffin/
If you're going to make false assertions, I want the sideshow with it.
Stomp your feet and hold your breath 'til you turn blue.
10 Feb 21
@no1marauder saidMueller claims that the IRA -- a Russian troll farm -- was the 2nd of "two principal interference operations" by Russian gov't. But as judge notes, Mueller's implied link between IRA & Russian gov't was false.
Aaron Mate either can't read or is a purveyor of falsehoods IF he thinks that Judge's Order in any way supports the claims he makes in the article.
It is in the report that link provided and you posted subsequently. You can't read.
10 Feb 21
@metal-brain saidThat's not at all what the Judge's Order, which you obviously didn't read, says.
Mueller claims that the IRA -- a Russian troll farm -- was the 2nd of "two principal interference operations" by Russian gov't. But as judge notes, Mueller's implied link between IRA & Russian gov't was false.
It is in the report that link provided and you posted subsequently. You can't read.
10 Feb 21
@no1marauder saidYou didn't read it. Read page 6 and 7
That's not at all what the Judge's Order, which you obviously didn't read, says.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6185644/Sealed-Order.pdf
11 Feb 21
@metal-brain saidI read it. It doesn't say what you claim. The Judge is complaining about prosecutors "expressing an extrajudicial opinion about a case" in violation of Rule 57.7. Nowhere, literally nowhere, does he even suggest that anything in Mueller's report isn't accurate.
You didn't read it. Read page 6 and 7
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6185644/Sealed-Order.pdf
You should stop getting your legal analysis from Russian propaganda outlets like RT.
11 Feb 21
@no1marauder saidYou are full of it. It says Mueller didn't make a connection with the Russian government. That is what is inaccurate. DUH!
I read it. It doesn't say what you claim. The Judge is complaining about prosecutors "expressing an extrajudicial opinion about a case" in violation of Rule 57.7. Nowhere, literally nowhere, does he even suggest that anything in Mueller's report isn't accurate.
You should stop getting your legal analysis from Russian propaganda outlets like RT.
You are in deep denial of the obvious.
11 Feb 21
@no1marauder saidI had a look at rationalwiki, their entry on YouTube is quite entertaining, having this sentence:
I'm certainly not going to waste almost two hours on a video from a crank.
For those interested in Corbett's "credentials" see: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/James_Corbett
Basically, he rants about every popular conspiracy, often on Russian propaganda sites.
Unsurprisingly, he has no formal training in history, economics or anything besides English and Anglo-Irish literature. https://wikispooks.com/wiki/James_Corbett
As it is generally free of pornography, YouTube is technically not really part of the Internet.[citation NOT needed]
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/YouTube
11 Feb 21
1 edit
@metal-brain saidYou're functionally illiterate and/or completely brainwashed to believe such obvious nonsense.
You are full of it. It says Mueller didn't make a connection with the Russian government. That is what is inaccurate. DUH!
You are in deep denial of the obvious.
The Mueller Report is replete with evidence showing the involvement of the Russian government in the scheme to help get Trump elected and no judge would claim otherwise.
11 Feb 21
@shavixmir saidNo he means the internet troll farm located in St Petersburg and definitely run by the Kremlin.
The Irish Republican Army is a Russian troll farm?
Do you mean those ugly Scandanavian dolls?
And why aren’t they produced regularly? Do you think they grow in the ground like Uruk Hai?
What the hell’s wrong with your meds today?
11 Feb 21
@no1marauder saidThat is your psychological projection. You clearly did not read the report. Here is an excerpt:
You're functionally illiterate and/or completely brainwashed to believe such obvious nonsense.
The Mueller Report is replete with evidence showing the involvement of the Russian government in the scheme to help get Trump elected and no judge would claim otherwise.
"The Special Counsel Report describes efforts by the Russian government to interfere with
the 2016 presidential election. See Special Counsel Report 36–65; see also Indictment, United
States v. Netyksho, No. 18-cr-215 (D.D.C. July 13, 2018), Dkt. 1 (indictment against multiple
Russian intelligence officers based on the alleged hacking and leaking of private documents
belonging to Democratic officials). But the indictment, which alleges that private Russian
entities and individuals conducted an “information warfare” campaign designed to sow discord
among U.S. voters, Indictment ¶ 10, does not link the defendants to the Russian government. "
What part of " does not link the defendants to the Russian government" do you not understand? Take off your blue tinted glasses so you can read that you are wrong. Now everyone here can see it but you.
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6185644/Sealed-Order.pdf