Trump shares fake photo of Diddy

@Suzianne said
Half of America watches Fox and the other half watches non-reactionary channels that happen to be actual news channels, not mere entertainment.

https://www.nationalmediaspots.com/

NMS would take issue with your statement

@AverageJoe1 said
https://www.nationalmediaspots.com/

NMS would take issue with your statement

So we have to sign up before we get to anything?

How about you tell us what NMS is saying?

@Suzianne said
Your supposed "punitive measure" on China will be paid for BY Americans, and so it becomes a punitive measure against Americans.

Thanks for nothing.

One could extrapolate this ridiculous statement by using the corner pharmacy and the pharmacist as example. Whew. Now, who is getting punished? Who is doing the wrong things? Buy low, sell high, all that reeeeaaaly confusing stuff. Who’s buying who’s selling, paying…..ahh, and the pesky deciding prices, decided by the pharmacist who sells products which belong to him.
Do you imply that he has a duty to the customer??

@kmax87 said
So we have to sign up before we get to anything?

How about you tell us what NMS is saying?

FOX viewers. 2,870,000
CNN. 807000

And so forth. Lists every tv channel

I am truth patrol

@AverageJoe1 said
One could extrapolate this ridiculous statement by using the corner pharmacy and the pharmacist as example. Whew. Now, who is getting punished? Who is doing the wrong things? Buy low, sell high, all that reeeeaaaly confusing stuff. Who’s buying who’s selling, paying…..ahh, and the pesky deciding prices, decided by the pharmacist who sells products which belong to him.
Do you imply that he has a duty to the customer??

Should gov get involved? Probably not get involved with lemonade stands, but at what point is the demarcation zone when the government starts getting involved in private businesses?
I think you are alluding to that concept.

@AverageJoe1 said
The present administration. As she has done nothing, never got a bill passed etc nor as vp, I don’t blame her.
Sure is crazy isn’t it. Yet she watched it all happen, that ‘paying more’ reference.

Baloney.

@AverageJoe1 said
FOX viewers. 2,870,000
CNN. 807000

And so forth. Lists every tv channel

I am truth patrol

Baloney.

@AverageJoe1 said
https://www.nationalmediaspots.com/

NMS would take issue with your statement

Whoever that is.

@Suzianne said
Whoever that is.

Truth hurts ..,,,,no, no,,,truth promotes anger!😡

@AverageJoe1 said
Truth hurts ..,,,,no, no,,,truth promotes anger!😡

Truth is non-existent for you... or Trump.

@Suzianne said
Truth is non-existent for you... or Trump.

What have I ever said that was not true? A mistatement here and there, corrected, but what untruths?

@AverageJoe1 said
What have I ever said that was not true? A mistatement here and there, corrected, but what untruths?

That you actually believe your alt right maga rants.

@kmax87 said
That you actually believe your alt right maga rants.

Here again, no mention by you fellers of SHouse rants. Curious indeed. No mention of ANY other rants.
So, what lies? Suzianne calls me out!,
Two of you stated last month that SS is paid with taxes, and, that fed govt pays bankruptcy. Not true.

@AverageJoe1 said
Here again, no mention by you fellers of SHouse rants. Curious indeed. No mention of ANY other rants.
So, what lies? Suzianne calls me out!,
Two of you stated last month that SS is paid with taxes, and, that fed govt pays bankruptcy. Not true.

If you prefer that taxes pay off debt and the treasury makes money out of thin air (via debt obligations to the fed) well however monies trickle into SS accounts or however liquidity flows to stave off bankruptcies, noone actually talks about things precisely or necessarily how they actually happen, because it’s just too long winded and pedantically correct for anyone to want to talk like that. Except maybe for Jordan Pietersen.

But if you go there then you have to talk about work as being earning the right to borrow your wages. And if you do go there you would be just one step away from declaring yourself a natural person not subject to maritime law. But do you really want to go there.

@kmax87 said
If you prefer that taxes pay off debt and the treasury makes money out of thin air (via debt obligations to the fed) well however monies trickle into SS accounts or however liquidity flows to stave off bankruptcies, noone actually talks about things precisely or necessarily how they actually happen, because it’s just too long winded and pedantically correct for anyone to want ...[text shortened]... declaring yourself a natural person not subject to maritime law. But do you really want to go there.

I’m sure McHill and Sue got that, but your saying that I (?) prefer taxes pay off debt leaves me speechless. Please explain that, or leave a lot of confusion on the table.
And, there need not be longwindedness to stipulate that creditors take the losses in bankruptcy, not the government. So your comments in that regard are off the wall. You speak of maritime law and ‘the right to borrow your wages”, to throw us all into confusion, but we are on to you.
A cool confusitory line, the ‘right to borrow wages’. Ha, I had to read it twice to be sure you actually said that!