Go back
US Funding the World

US Funding the World

Debates

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
01 Apr 11
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s two-year fight to shield crisis-squeezed banks from the stigma of revealing their public loans protected a lender to local governments in Belgium, a Japanese fishing-cooperative financier and a company part-owned by the Central Bank of Libya.

Dexia SA (DEXB), based in Brussels and Paris, borrowed as much as $33.5 billion through its New York branch from the Fed’s “discount window” lending program, according to Fed documents released yesterday in response to a Freedom of Information Act request. Dublin-based Depfa Bank Plc, taken over in 2007 by a German real-estate lender later seized by the German government, drew $24.5 billion.

The biggest borrowers from the 97-year-old discount window as the program reached its crisis-era peak were foreign banks, accounting for at least 70 percent of the $110.7 billion borrowed during the week in October 2008 when use of the program surged to a record.



This is absolute crap. The Fed is for US banks, not for international banks. But I suppose it is no wonder considering the fact that global power players watch each others' backs. The Fed is nothing more than an play thing for the important people of the world.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
01 Apr 11
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Are you suggesting foreign banks should not be able to operate in the US?

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
01 Apr 11
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Are you suggesting foreign banks should not be able to operate in the US?
I'm suggesting that foreign banks should not be able to borrow US Fed money. They can operate, but the Fed is supposed to be for US banks. Let banks from other countries borrow money from their own version of the Fed.

JS357

Joined
29 Dec 08
Moves
6788
Clock
01 Apr 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
[b]U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke’s two-year fight to shield crisis-squeezed banks from the stigma of revealing their public loans protected a lender to local governments in Belgium, a Japanese fishing-cooperative financier and a company part-owned by the Central Bank of Libya.

Dexia SA (DEXB), based in Brussels and Paris, borrowed as much ...[text shortened]... hers' backs. The Fed is nothing more than an play thing for the important people of the world.
Assuming it is legal, it all boils down to whether the actions benefit your interests enough to tolerate it.

finnegan
GENS UNA SUMUS

Joined
25 Jun 06
Moves
64930
Clock
01 Apr 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
I'm suggesting that foreign banks should not be able to borrow US Fed money. They can operate, but the Fed is supposed to be for US banks. Let banks from other countries borrow money from their own version of the Fed.
Plenty of US banks operate around the world and much of the US economy relies on foreign investment. It's called globalisation and the US is a huge participant.

There is no strictly US financial market. But there is a US economy which depends on the globalised financial markets. Not sure how you envisage the US opting out of that, and what the countless other countries subjected to it at the insistence of the US would respond if it was tried. Start with asking who invests in the bonds keeping the US economy afloat. Clue - not primarily Americans!

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
02 Apr 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
I'm suggesting that foreign banks should not be able to borrow US Fed money. They can operate, but the Fed is supposed to be for US banks. Let banks from other countries borrow money from their own version of the Fed.
Oh I see, so different rules for different banks. Not very capitalist of you.

E

Joined
12 Jul 08
Moves
13814
Clock
02 Apr 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Oh I see, so different rules for different banks. Not very capitalist of you.
If the Fed is nothing more than a private bank, then do away with it. There is something fudnamentally wrong with a private business controlling the nation's currency.

If the Fed is a branch of the US government, then it should serve it's purpose: to provide a central bank for US banks.

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
02 Apr 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Eladar
If the Fed is nothing more than a private bank, then do away with it. There is something fudnamentally wrong with a private business controlling the nation's currency.

If the Fed is a branch of the US government, then it should serve it's purpose: to provide a central bank for US banks.
Globalists run the US now and have for some time. That is why they don't enforce borders or bother to notify Congress when the US goes to war etc. In fact, globalism is why we go to war now.

Now we are all just one big happy family!! 😵

g

Pepperland

Joined
30 May 07
Moves
12892
Clock
02 Apr 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
Globalists run the US now and have for some time. That is why they don't enforce borders or bother to notify Congress when the US goes to war etc. In fact, globalism is why we go to war now.

Now we are all just one big happy family!! 😵
Its good to see you're not making any secret of the fact your views are fueled by conspiracy theories.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26755
Clock
02 Apr 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
Globalists run the US now and have for some time. That is why they don't enforce borders or bother to notify Congress when the US goes to war etc. In fact, globalism is why we go to war now.

Now we are all just one big happy family!! 😵
Make up your mind - is it globalism or statism?

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
03 Apr 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Make up your mind - is it globalism or statism?
How can a globalist not be a statist?

I know, maybe they wish to decentralize power and give power back to the masses so that they can form a one world governing body. 🙄

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
03 Apr 11
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by generalissimo
Its good to see you're not making any secret of the fact your views are fueled by conspiracy theories.
So you deny that globalism is reality in today's geopolitical arena? Who said anything about conspiracies? I know of many people that think its just great when the President of the United States goes to war because a world wide governing body tells him to do so without so much as consulting Congress.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
03 Apr 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
So you deny that globalism is reality in today's geopolitical arena? Who said anything about conspiracies? I know of many people that think its just great when the President of the United States goes to war because a world wide governing body tells him to do so without so much as consulting Congress.
Globalization is not the same as a new world order, whodey.

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
03 Apr 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Globalization is not the same as a new world order, whodey.
True, it is a stepping stone.

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
03 Apr 11
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
True, it is a stepping stone.
In what way exactly?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.