https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41488081
Firearms deaths are a fixture in American life.
There were 1.5 million of them between 1968 and 2017 - that's higher than the number of soldiers killed in every US conflict since the American War for Independence in 1775.
In 2020 alone, more than 45,000 Americans died at the end of a barrel of a gun, whether by homicide or suicide, more than any other year on record. The figure represents a 25% increase from five years prior, and a 43% increase from 2010.
The country with the second highest gun to citizen ratio is Yemen. They have 52.8 guns per person. Canada has 34.7 guns per inhabitant.
The US has 120.5 guns per in habitant.
The UK and Australia (where guns are illegal) have very low gun-related killings (percentage of homicides committed: 4% and 13😵.
Canada is 37% and the US is 79%.
Mass shootings, according to FBI figures, are getting ever larger (more deaths per shooting).
52% of Americans want stricter gun control.
91% of denocrats want more gun control.
The gun lobby far outspends the gun control lobby per year.
With such an obvious causation (more guns = more gun related deaths), why do republicans want less gun control or to keep the status quo?
It can’t be the arms manufacturers on this one. Their main source of income is war. Guns are costly to make and last a long time. Ammo? Private shooting can’t be a large factor in the profits.
Obviously my goto would be that they have small cocks and want to compensate.
But in all reality, that’s more of a joke than a real opinion.
It’s obviously not for hunting (not that many people hunt and you wouldn’t need that many guns anyway) and it can’t be for shooting range fun, because you don’t need that many guns… and very few homicides take place on shooting ranges.
So, what then? Fear?
Or just a love of owning guns? And if that’s it, how come that fancy is split down party political lines? That’s just too much of a coincidence for a fetish.
What is it that makes republicans want to own guns?
@shavixmir saidI’m beginning to think you’re a bigger moron on each post I read of yours except science and sorts where you know more.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41488081
[i]Firearms deaths are a fixture in American life.
There were 1.5 million of them between 1968 and 2017 - that's higher than the number of soldiers killed in every US conflict since the American War for Independence in 1775.
In 2020 alone, more than 45,000 Americans died at the end of a barrel of a gun, whether by homic ...[text shortened]... just too much of a coincidence for a fetish.
What is it that makes republicans want to own guns?
With such an obvious causation (more guns = more gun related deaths), why do republicans want less gun control or to keep the status quo?
I’m all for restrictions that are maybe a little slower and more in depth and looking for criminals owning guns and enforcing with stronger sentences and fair not based on politics and this wonderful new culture, also more strict gun shows. I would also guess most people in America rep or regular normal balanced dem’s would appreciate this actually going after the one’s actually creating the vast majority of these huge numbers in places like our wonderfully run Dem cities. Do you have any breakdowns adding stats like this in and politics😆. Not talking about any color’s but still would be interesting.
Get past this one with a logical backed up response and we can move onto the rest, I don’t want to overload and confuse you more. 😀
@shavixmir saidIt's called a 'right'. But since you don't know what rights are it's just going over the same ground round and over again. No wonder No1 got bored and threatens to leave every week, sometimes more often than that.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-41488081
[i]Firearms deaths are a fixture in American life.
There were 1.5 million of them between 1968 and 2017 - that's higher than the number of soldiers killed in every US conflict since the American War for Independence in 1775.
In 2020 alone, more than 45,000 Americans died at the end of a barrel of a gun, whether by homic ...[text shortened]... just too much of a coincidence for a fetish.
What is it that makes republicans want to own guns?
@mike69 said?
I’m beginning to think you’re a bigger moron on each post I read of yours except science and sorts where you know more.
With such an obvious causation (more guns = more gun related deaths), why do republicans want less gun control or to keep the status quo?
I’m all for restrictions that are maybe a little slower and more in depth and looking for criminals owning guns and ...[text shortened]... l backed up response and we can move onto the rest, I don’t want to overload and confuse you more. 😀
@shavixmir
I’ll also say I don’t carry or have one in my car you know why?
It’s safe, gun murder not on the news much or other serious crimes, unlike the things going on in your cities😱. So simply keep your stupidity and all that goes on within your own walls were fine.
@shavixmir saidSounds about right from you, you could make out enough to answer something is there a reason. Ask if I can help on something. Is the huge number of deaths by people with records and how many from people being let out of jail early vrs gun numbers?
?
Hmm ?? Another reason we’re not cramped together like sardines (also thinking we’re all the same, live the same, which also creates different reasons for owning more than one) and over time in poor conditions and situations or not people become more like animals especially with stupid leadership.
@shavixmir saidAnswer the questions, you started this thread o brilliant one😃, we can go from there. You made statements with no facts other than ending numbers to prove your point, are you really that slow.
You’re off your rocker dude.
You can talk to your momma that way, as you spank yourself silly imagining you’re a dom, but you’re a pathetic incel and ooze it all over the bloody place.
Jesus. Nutjob.
The post that was quoted here has been removedOmg sock sucker ( thanks for the idea @rookie😆) are you really not going to answer anything about your own thread except call names, and throw more faceless claims, that’s easy da. You my friend are a bad a$$!🤞stupid fuk. See how easy that is?, try answering and let’s discuss it mr end result and no facts, mr scientist😅.
@mike69 saidWe've been over and over guns here, this was just so much more flame bait so that shag doody could do a big set up for his small penis joke and use up his weekly allocation of the word 'incel'.
Omg sock sucker ( thanks for the idea @rookie😆) are you really not going to answer anything about your own thread except call names, and throw more faceless claims, that’s easy da. You my friend are a bad a$$!🤞stupid fuk. See how easy that is?, try answering and let’s discuss it mr end result and no facts, mr scientist😅.