@metal-brain saidNo one says this.
Some people have pointed out that VAERS data is not accurate
https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html
VAERS has a disclaimer right on it's main page explaining that they are only collecting reports; they're not saying the reports have been verified.
It's not the fault of VAERS you don't understand disclaimers.
Enough of your nonesense.
@metal-brain saidYou’re wrong so often, yet this time…
You are an American.
Nope. You’re wrong again.
11 Jan 22
@vivify saidOf course.
No one says this.
https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html
VAERS has a disclaimer right on it's main page explaining that they are only collecting reports; they're not saying the reports have been verified.
It's not the fault of VAERS you don't understand disclaimers.
Enough of your nonesense.
They know only a fraction of people who experience adverse events from vaccines report them. Like I said, I agree that it is not accurate. It is a severe under count.
BTW, why is government not interested in verifying adverse events including deaths from the gene vaccines?
@metal-brain saidThese threads should be deleted. VAERS is exactly what it claims to be on the website. Other types of information exist, for example double blind randomized controlled clinical trials, for understanding the types of questions you're asking.
Some people have pointed out that VAERS data is not accurate and I agree, it isn't. It is an under count because most people that have vaccine adverse events do NOT report them.
Heck, I'll bet most Americans have never heard of VAERS.
11 Jan 22
1 edit
@wildgrass saidIf VAERS is exactly what it claims to be on the website why does VAERS data need to be censored? The government provides that data since VAERS is a government institution.
These threads should be deleted. VAERS is exactly what it claims to be on the website. Other types of information exist, for example double blind randomized controlled clinical trials, for understanding the types of questions you're asking.
Your problem is with the government for making the data available to the public. If they had any better data to offer we would not be having this discussion. That is the problem. They will not confirm any of it so they can have plausible denial.
Government has no interest in giving you confirmed numbers. Government wants to be able to deny their own numbers. They could deny you any numbers, but that would be too obvious. They prefer unconfirmed numbers.
Why doesn't government count vaccine adverse event deaths the same way they count covid deaths?
"Other types of information exist, for example double blind randomized controlled clinical trials, for understanding the types of questions you're asking"
I don't recall you ever posting any.
Do you have any to offer?
11 Jan 22
@metal-brain saidTheir data does not need to be censored; misleading use of their data, like what Marjorie Taylor Greene did, needs to be censored.
If VAERS is exactly what it claims to be on the website why does VAERS data need to be censored?
11 Jan 22
@metal-brain saidVAERS data is not censored. Powerful people who misinterpret what VAERS data means are and should be censored. VAERS data does not address the question you ask about death.
If VAERS is exactly what it claims to be on the website why does VAERS data need to be censored? The government provides that data since VAERS is a government institution.
Your problem is with the government for making the data available to the public. If they had any better data to offer we would not be having this discussion. That is the problem. They will not confir ...[text shortened]... ypes of questions you're asking"
I don't recall you ever posting any.
Do you have any to offer?
I have posted COVID vaccine clinical trial data several times over. But you decided not to read it.
11 Jan 22
@vivify said"misleading use of their data, like what Marjorie Taylor Greene did, needs to be censored."
Their data does not need to be censored; misleading use of their data, like what Marjorie Taylor Greene did, needs to be censored.
How did she use VAERS data to make it misleading? You have never explained that. Your own article said the VAERS data itself was misleading, not how she presented the data.
11 Jan 22
@wildgrass said"Powerful people who misinterpret what VAERS data means are and should be censored."
VAERS data is not censored. Powerful people who misinterpret what VAERS data means are and should be censored. VAERS data does not address the question you ask about death.
I have posted COVID vaccine clinical trial data several times over. But you decided not to read it.
That is not what MTG did. You are spreading misinformation.
11 Jan 22
1 edit
@metal-brain saidYou're misinterpreting. I didn't write that she did. If I thought that, I would have written it.
"Powerful people who misinterpret what VAERS data means are and should be censored."
That is not what MTG did. You are spreading misinformation.
11 Jan 22
@wildgrass saidMTG did NOT misinterpret what VAERS data means.
You're misinterpreting. I didn't write that she did. If I thought that, I would have written it.
She was banned for posting VAERS data.