20 Nov 19
@metal-brain saidThe "do-not-investigate" list has been debunked numerous times.
George Kent wrote a letter saying not to investigate the Anti-Corruption Action Center for embezzlement and that they didn't care what the money was used for.
20 Nov 19
@metal-brain saidOkay. Not global warming.
Venice is sinking into the ocean. Sea level rise is NOT the problem, but it is predictably being blamed for it.
https://www.livescience.com/19195-venice-sinking-slowly.html
Whenever GW alarmists blame sea level rise for a city or island losing land look for another reason and you will find it. Sea levels are simply not rising at an alarming rate.
However, from the BBC:
This latest Acqua Alta occurrence in Venice is the second highest tide in recorded history. However, if we look at the top 10 tides, five have occurred in the past 20 years and the most recent was only last year.
50% of the top ten tides in the last 500 years or so have been in the last 20 years.
What’s your argument against this?
21 Nov 19
@shavixmir saidWhat???
Okay. Not global warming.
However, from the BBC:
This latest Acqua Alta occurrence in Venice is the second highest tide in recorded history. However, if we look at the top 10 tides, five have occurred in the past 20 years and the most recent was only last year.
50% of the top ten tides in the last 500 years or so have been in the last 20 years.
What’s your argument against this?
Are you claiming high tides are caused by GW?
21 Nov 19
@shavixmir saidWhat???
Okay. Not global warming.
Are you claiming high tides are caused by GW?
Oh. I see what you wrote......................
21 Nov 19
@metal-brain saidI have no opinion about tides in Venice, as such.
What???
Are you claiming high tides are caused by GW?
However, 50% of the highest tides have been in the last 20 years.
Is that coincidence? Is that correlation? Is it...
Go on. Take a stab at it!
21 Nov 19
@suzianne saidNot really. There was no list passed from one person to another giving plausible deniability, but the names were given. Merely a distinction without a difference.
The "do-not-investigate" list has been debunked numerous times.
Besides, George Kent wrote a letter asking that the Anti-corruption Action Center not be prosecuted. He basically said he didn't care where the money went. Soloman posted the document and you can read it yourself. This "do not investigate" request is real and proven.
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/435906-us-embassy-pressed-ukraine-to-drop-probe-of-george-soros-group-during-2016
https://www.scribd.com/document/402559592/Embassy2GPLetter4-4-16
Try not to be too disappointed honey.
@metal-brain saidAGAIN, the "do-not-investigate" list has been debunked numerous times.
Not really. There was no list passed from one person to another giving plausible deniability, but the names were given. Merely a distinction without a difference.
Besides, George Kent wrote a letter asking that the Anti-corruption Action Center not be prosecuted. He basically said he didn't care where the money went. Soloman posted the document and you can read it your ...[text shortened]... ://www.scribd.com/document/402559592/Embassy2GPLetter4-4-16
Try not to be too disappointed honey.
IF this George Kent request is a separate request, so what? There is NO reason they should be investigated. You seem to forget that it was Shokin, who tried to prosecute a legitimate organization for personal benefit, who is corrupt.
21 Nov 19
@suzianne saidIf Shokin was corrupt why hasn't any more corruption been exposed than when Shokin was AG? The nearly 2 billion IMF money is still missing. It looks like Biden was covering up a money laundering scheme.
AGAIN, the "do-not-investigate" list has been debunked numerous times.
IF this George Kent request is a separate request, so what? There is NO reason they should be investigated. You seem to forget that it was Shokin, who tried to prosecute a legitimate organization for personal benefit, who is corrupt.
