Originally posted by der schwarze RitterAt least most of them served. These asses in power in the Republican party sat on their butts and cowered.
Unfortunately, all the elite in the Democratic Party, from the San Francisco Democrats to the bluebloods of Massachusetts and New York, feel nothing but contempt for the military and the unwashed masses.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterIf you feel anything other than contempt for the soldiers in uniform, you will demand that we get them out of Iraq as soon as possible and set US foreign policy back on a track that makes sense.
Unfortunately, all the elite in the Democratic Party, from the San Francisco Democrats to the bluebloods of Massachusetts and New York, feel nothing but contempt for the military and the unwashed masses.
Originally posted by sasquatch672Why is he a 'want-to-be-frog'? I thought this was about Gaelic football... and how Kerry are doing in the off-season.
Johnny BOY! It wasn't even a presidential year and you managed to immolate not just yourself but your party so spectacularly that you've ended your political career! Thank you, you wanna-be frog, you puke! Damn. You want to believe a veteran, any veteran, is a capable person. Then you get this guy who calls veterans dumb. What a KNUCKLEHEAD, John ...[text shortened]... n front of the American people, what do you think's going to happen?
Way to go John Boy!
Originally posted by 7ate9I've just got back from an appointment at the drug and alcohol department & are left wondering is it really that good.
Democracy rulers are a reflection of the societies we are. Kerry and Bush are the closest matches to society possible...
The perfect images of American people. 🙂.
😲
Originally posted by badmoonDo you think Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Diane Feinstein, Teddy Kennedy or either of the Clintons ever served? Kerry is the only one among the group I cited who ever was a soldier and he's a self-loathing one at that. There’s something deep-rooted among the Democratic leadership that despises the military. This cancer is also prevalent among the professors and administrators at America’s Ivy League colleges and in the newsrooms of the dinosaur media.
At least most of them served. These asses in power in the Republican party sat on their butts and cowered.
Originally posted by WulebgrThe track that makes sense is putting more soldiers on the ground in Iraq. Why do you think the terrorists are hoping the Democrats win the upcoming election? And for anybody who's still on the fence, just remember: a vote for Democrats this Nov. 7 is a vote for terrorists.
If you feel anything other than contempt for the soldiers in uniform, you will demand that we get them out of Iraq as soon as possible and set US foreign policy back on a track that makes sense.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterAre these terrorists actively campaigning for Democrats, or do you have inside knowledge of their thought processes?
The track that makes sense is putting more soldiers on the ground in Iraq. Why do you think the terrorists are hoping the Democrats win the upcoming election? And for anybody who's still on the fence, just remember: a vote for Democrats this Nov. 7 is a vote for terrorists.
Even though Democrats are "better" for the common people of the
rest of the world, the truth is that no matter who wins, the way
things are done and the real bosses will not change.
The superstructure is there, above the structure, and will let the little
pawns down there do their mud wrestling as long as the status quo is
not changed.
Granted, Kerry may or may not have been intentionally insulting the intellectual prowess of US troops.
But even if he was saying the troops aren't the brightest lights in the US, is he wrong?
Where do the recruiting officers go to recruit young people in the US? Most of it is in backwater towns in the middle of nowhere. The recruiters don't spend much time at Harvard and MIT lookin for new troops.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterChrist you're an idiot.
The track that makes sense is putting more soldiers on the ground in Iraq. Why do you think the terrorists are hoping the Democrats win the upcoming election? And for anybody who's still on the fence, just remember: a vote for Democrats this Nov. 7 is a vote for terrorists.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterI respect them enough to want them to have the support they need to get home safely, get an education, have a family. Too bad this administration has cut military benefits, health care for veterans, etc. Apparently the Republican notion of "supporting the troops" means sending them ill-equipped to war, failing to heed the strategic advice of military experts, and then pulling the rug out from under the feet of returning troops.
Unfortunately, all the elite in the Democratic Party, from the San Francisco Democrats to the bluebloods of Massachusetts and New York, feel nothing but contempt for the military and the unwashed masses.
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterThe war in Iraq has become a primary recruitment vehicle for violent Islamic extremists, motivating a new generation of potential terrorists around the world whose numbers may be increasing faster than the United States and its allies can reduce the threat, U.S. intelligence analysts have concluded.
The track that makes sense is putting more soldiers on the ground in Iraq. Why do you think the terrorists are hoping the Democrats win the upcoming election? And for anybody who's still on the fence, just remember: a vote for Democrats this Nov. 7 is a vote for terrorists.
A 30-page National Intelligence Estimate completed in April cites the "centrality" of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, and the insurgency that has followed, as the leading inspiration for new Islamic extremist networks and cells that are united by little more than an anti-Western agenda. It concludes that, rather than contributing to eventual victory in the global counterterrorism struggle, the situation in Iraq has worsened the U.S. position, according to officials familiar with the classified document.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/23/AR2006092301130.html