22 Apr 08
1 edit
Originally posted by whodeyThere is no doubt the US needs a fiscally responsible government. The republicans for too long have mismanaged the finances of the country.
It's just a good thing the Democrats won big in Congress this last go around. See how it benefited us all? I can't wait till they finish us off by getting a President in there to complete the job.
Bring back the Democrats and you won't see the gigantic deficits every year. Clinton was the only one in the last 20 years to have a surplus.
How the republicans are thought of as the ones that are the good money managers is beyond me.
22 Apr 08
1 edit
Originally posted by uzlessyes i can't wait to be taxed to death by Obama/Clinton to pay for all of there handouts and government controls.
There is no doubt the US needs a fiscally responsible government. The republicans for too long have mismanaged the finances of the country.
Bring back the Democrats and you won't see the gigantic deficits every year. Clinton was the only one in the last 20 years to have a surplus.
How the republicans are thought of as the ones that are the good money managers is beyond me.
p.s. Do you even know why Clinton had a surplus? He can thank Reagan for the tax breaks he gave businesses in the 80's allowing them (tech. industry) to flourish. That is why the economy was so great.
Lets also thank Bill for letting Osama go when he was captured in the Sudan which is why we are at War and running a deficit.
22 Apr 08
1 edit
Originally posted by NimzovichLarsenpffftt revisionist history drivel. Clinton had a surplus, because he signed into law "paygo" which severly restricted spending. bush let it lapse. But don't worry, you will be paying for handouts...its called corporate welfare, and that is much of the reason we have a deficit. So tighten your belt, because it will be years before we are finished paying for bush's corporate welfare giveaways.
yes i can't wait to be taxed to death by Obama/Clinton to pay for all of there handouts and government controls.
p.s. Do you even know why Clinton had a surplus? He can thank Reagan for the tax breaks he gave businesses in the 80's allowing them (tech. industry) to flourish. That is why the economy was so great.
Lets also thank Bill for let ...[text shortened]... g Osama go when he was captured in the Sudan which is why we are at War and running a deficit.
btw, Reagan defict spent this country into a trillion dollar deficit, while lowering the capital gains tax, which gave rise to the 80's real estate boom, combined with his banking deregulating, caused the savings and loan melt down. Bush gets into office, and oh look, history repeats itself😛
22 Apr 08
Originally posted by dueceryour incorrect observations appear agenda driven. You don't hate Bush do you?
pffftt revisionist history drivel. Clinton had a surplus, because he signed into law "paygo" which severly restricted spending. bush let it lapse. But don't worry, you will be paying for handouts...its called corporate welfare, and that is much of the reason we have a deficit. So tighten your belt, because it will be years before we are finished paying for bu ...[text shortened]... he savings and loan melt down. Bush gets into office, and oh look, history repeats itself😛
22 Apr 08
Originally posted by Squelchbelchi think we all realize if there was no 911 there would be no war. You can blame Clinton as much as Bush but you don't. You don't because you hate Bush. Keep trying to be funny.......
I thought you were at war because of Saddam's 15-minute warning WMD threat!
22 Apr 08
Originally posted by NimzovichLarsenYour views are just as skewed as mine.
i think we all realize if there was no 911 there would be no war. You can blame Clinton as much as Bush but you don't. You don't because you hate Bush. Keep trying to be funny.......
Until you can be honest with yourself & answer the awkward question as to why the 9/11 attacks happened, you will never learn.
22 Apr 08
Originally posted by NimzovichLarsenI think at this stage 'like and dislike' cease to have any meaning. It is simply a varying degree of dis-like. You either dis-like him or you out right hate him. There really is nothing to like the guy for, whatsoever!
your incorrect observations appear agenda driven. You don't hate Bush do you?