09 Sep 06
I find it strange that although people are now willing to admit that
the motives of war on Iraq have been proven to be false, the real
reasons for 9/11 seem to have dropped out of peoples minds.
If he was lying about Saddam, why not 9/11.
9/11 served Bush's interests in conducting this war and without such
an event the war could not and would not have gone ahead.
How much of an influence either through negligence or direct conspiracy
did the Bush administration have on this event??
The implications are enormous. If it could be proved that Bush is
willing to kill his own people or allow them to be killed for the purposes
of conducting an illegal war, how would Americans and the worldwide
audience react?
09 Sep 06
Originally posted by Thequ1ckThe human brain always seeks pattern in the information it is given, this skill developed through countless years of evolution is what made us so successful as specie.
I find it strange that although people are now willing to admit that
the motives of war on Iraq have been proven to be false, the real
reasons for 9/11 seem to have dropped out of peoples minds.
If he was lying about Saddam, why not 9/11.
9/11 served Bush's interests in conducting this war and without such
an event the war could not and would not h ...[text shortened]... purposes
of conducting an illegal war, how would Americans and the worldwide
audience react?
However sometime our pattern seeking brain goes completely off the mark – thus those strange conspiracy theories.
And truly this one with Bush being part of a 9/11 conspiracy is way out there.
Sometimes the world is simpler than one would like to think.
Bush is in my humble opinion not a good president for the American people, and the rest of the world would also be better off having a competent person in charge of the currently single most influential country in the world.
But if Bush and friends wanted to make usa more hostile towards Irak in particular and the middle east in general then there are other means, like false testimony about weapons of mass destruction etc.
We have seen those employed and though they are immoral – they are not illegal like conspiracy to murder would be.
So why take the chance when you can achieve the same objectives with less risk.
Get real, those strange ideas about a giant 9/11 conspiracy only belong ammong the iliterate.
09 Sep 06
Originally posted by Thequ1ckProbably the same level of influence through negligence or direct conspiracy that occured during the Clinton administration had when the terrorists bombed the WT Centers for the first time in the early 1990's.
How much of an influence either through negligence or direct conspiracy
did the Bush administration have on this event??
The implications are enormous. If it could be proved that Bush is
willing to kill his own people or allow them to be killed for the purposes
of conducting an illegal war, how would Americans and the worldwide
audience react?[/b]
09 Sep 06
Originally posted by Thequ1ckI really hope Hillary gets elected next time around so I can dust off my Clinton conspiracy file and start posting.
I find it strange that although people are now willing to admit that
the motives of war on Iraq have been proven to be false, the real
reasons for 9/11 seem to have dropped out of peoples minds.
If he was lying about Saddam, why not 9/11.
9/11 served Bush's interests in conducting this war and without such
an event the war could not and would not h ...[text shortened]... purposes
of conducting an illegal war, how would Americans and the worldwide
audience react?
09 Sep 06
1 edit
Originally posted by xsI think it was Clinton who set up Bush. Think about it. Clinton knowingly allows the conspiracy to blow up the Twin towers to emerge. He then intervenes to stop the first attempt from being successful so that he would not get blamed for it. However, he then allows the plans to blow up the twin towers to continue so that if a political opponent ever recaptured the White House they could be allowed to succeed and subsequently blame the Republican administration in office. Therefore, Clinton was nothing more than a type of sleeper cell. Now that Bush has been blamed for the disaster, his wife can now come on the scene to reclaim the White House for the Clintons by blaming Bush and the fall out that insued. BRILLIANT!!!!!!!!!
Lol, I've prepared a new avatar for her campaign.
http://xs206.xs.to/xs206/06366/square-med-redefeat.gif
09 Sep 06
Originally posted by ScheelDo you think the war is in the interest of coorperations. Einsenhower spoke of this. Military-industrial complex.
The human brain always seeks pattern in the information it is given, this skill developed through countless years of evolution is what made us so successful as specie.
However sometime our pattern seeking brain goes completely off the mark – thus those strange conspiracy theories.
And truly this one with Bush being part of a 9/11 conspiracy is way out there ...[text shortened]...
Get real, those strange ideas about a giant 9/11 conspiracy only belong ammong the iliterate.
09 Sep 06
Originally posted by whodeyNow that is a conspiracy theory I can believe, whodey. One rec. And maybe Monica (whom I found rather attractive) will become Hillary's Surgeon General, concentrating on a public education program highlighting cigar insertion and sanitary swallowing.
I think it was Clinton who set up Bush. Think about it. Clinton knowingly allows the conspiracy to blow up the Twin towers to emerge. He then intervenes to stop the first attempt from being successful so that he would not get blamed for it. However, he then allows the plans to blow up the twin towers to continue so that if a political opponent ever recapt ...[text shortened]... e White House for the Clintons by blaming Bush and the fall out that insued. BRILLIANT!!!!!!!!!