25 Apr 08
1 edit
Originally posted by telerion
The stupid person finds research and inquiry too strenuous so he adopts any idea that appeals to him emotionally. Overtime he amasses many strange ideas and, without the refining nature of self-criticism to weed some out, he collects an amalgamation of absurdities. Since inward-directed criticism is to be avoided at almost any cost, he defends his hideous Frankenstein to such an extreme that to any reasonable person he appears laughably ridiculous, that is to say, stupid.
this is the "why are stupid people stupid?" thread, not the "why are stupid global warming alarmists stupid?" thread.
25 Apr 08
Originally posted by uzlessyou rec'd that? hadn't you heard it before? are you guys teenyboppers?
I see no one caught on to your trickery with the stats....
For those of you with cognitive deficiencies, the 50% mark is the AVERAGE....so of course there are 50% of peoople below the average.
😛
I'm giving you my first rec ever
28 Apr 08
1 edit
Originally posted by zeeblebotI think the description better fits the anti-GW crowd, but really it could be any issue where a person refuses to think. Debating matters of scientific knowledge from a position of political partisanship is generally a clear sign of stupidity.
Originally posted by telerion
[b]The stupid person finds research and inquiry too strenuous so he adopts any idea that appeals to him emotionally. Overtime he amasses many strange ideas and, without the refining nature of self-criticism to weed some out, he collects an amalgamation of absurdities. Since inward-directed criticism is to be avoided ...[text shortened]... people stupid?" thread, not the "why are stupid global warming alarmists stupid?" thread.[/b]
After all, why do all the heavy lifting yourself, when your favorite party cheerleader can tell you what to think, and better yet what to say to those who disagree?