Why do drag queens want audiences of children?

@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
So if a child can do anything he or she wants and is out with gang members or some such, the parents get a bye?

You don’t have children do you😁.

@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
So if a child can do anything he or she wants and is out with gang members or some such, the parents get a bye?

Sonhouse. When the child wakes up, the parent decides what he does all day, and night.
That should answer all of your questions. Take your meds.

PS: Where do you get that a kid can do what he/she wants?

@jj-adams said
Thank you for that totally irrelevant comment.
Now tell us you like pie or whatever.

he was trying to convey the subtle point that what it is irrelevant people consider salacious since that varies from region to region or a particular period but he made one crucial mistake in his arguing. He forgot you're one particularly dumb donkey and you won't understand

@soothfast said
Belly dancing: salacious to you, or not?

I would like to see this question answered by the local Morality Police here.

And, if twerking is "obscene" in the context of a drag queen show, and we outlaw parents bringing their children to any drag queen show just because some shows may feature "child-traumatizing" twerking, it seems to me that we must then go on to make it a criminal offense for anyone to move their hips in certain ways in public view. Certain core exercises I've frequently seen done by others in a gym most definitely would need to be deemed illegal, since children are allowed in gyms.

This whole thing is so stupid.

@zahlanzi said
he was trying to convey the subtle point that what it is irrelevant people consider salacious since that varies from region to region or a particular period but he made one crucial mistake in his arguing. He forgot you're one particularly dumb donkey and you won't understand

This alone is thread material!! Zahlanzi is saying people have diff definitions (of every word in the dictionary) , be they living on the same street, or in countries 12,000 miles apart. Their diff beliefs also vary from region to region.
There is no QUESTION that my definition of salacious is entirely different than that of, say, Shav.
So Zajlanzi, you have posted common knowledge. So what is your point of the post.

@soothfast said
I would like to see this question answered by the local Morality Police here.

And, if twerking is "obscene" in the context of a drag queen show, and we outlaw parents bringing their children to any drag queen show just because some shows may feature "child-traumatizing" twerking, it seems to me that we must then go on to make it a criminal offense for [i]an ...[text shortened]... uld need to be deemed illegal, since children are allowed in gyms.

This whole thing is so stupid.

What is stupid is the way that this thread has been diluted so much with foolish writing . Is not the issue of this thread, taking children to drag shows, which appropriately opened up a discussion of the place of the parents?
We discussed it, I came down on the side of only the parents make decisions about children. Others here came down, as might be expected, quite more liberally, and wanting to discuss the definitions of words and twerks. I never did learn if they would keep their children from going to drag shows. They do not answer questions
I would think that we would have resolved it early with yeas or nays, but the liberals seem to want to go heavy into all of these definitions. I don’t know what else to write about. Would you take your children to dragshows. What is there left to write about
I noted that son house was suggesting the possibility of children just going by themselves without the parents’ knowledge. That has nothing to do with this issue. Nothing at all. Bad parenting, maybe.

@averagejoe1 said
What is stupid is the way that this thread has been diluted so much with foolish writing . Is not the issue of this thread, taking children to drag shows, which appropriately opened up a discussion of the place of the parents?
We discussed it, I came down on the side of only the parents make decisions about children. Others here came down, as might be expected, quite ...[text shortened]... he parents’ knowledge. That has nothing to do with this issue. Nothing at all. Bad parenting, maybe.

I know you're the village Attention Whore, but I'm not talking to you.

@soothfast said
I know you're the village Attention Whore, but I'm not talking to you.

Sorry, looked back a few clicks to see who in the world you were saying that to...........and you were saying it to yourself!! Jesus, you are getting like Sonhouse, too.
I do think a lot of you write to yourself.

@soothfast said
I would like to see this question answered by the local Morality Police here.

And, if twerking is "obscene" in the context of a drag queen show, and we outlaw parents bringing their children to any drag queen show just because some shows may feature "child-traumatizing" twerking, it seems to me that we must then go on to make it a criminal offense for [i]an ...[text shortened]... uld need to be deemed illegal, since children are allowed in gyms.

This whole thing is so stupid.

You and No1 have been asked repeatedly where the line is, I believe when it comes to children there is a line, consenting adults - no line, children - there is a line. Your refusal to acknowledge that there is a line, if the parents say it's Ok then there is no place for the state to interfere allows us to infer kid porn is OK for you and possibly the whole reason you're unable to condemn the drags men for using children to push their adult agenda.

We all know that if a mother can sell pictures of her naked 7 year old son to No.3 (name disguised to protect the individual) and his NAMBLA buddies then there are mothers that will do exactly that. The boy is unharmed, it's just some harmless pictures right.

@no1marauder said
Did the women consent to being flashed?

No. Unlike the people who go see these shows.

Did the children consent to being groomed?

This is where parental guidance comes into play.

@earl-of-trumps said
Did the children consent to being groomed?

This is where parental guidance comes into play.

Their consent would mean crap. Next the libs will tell you the they want the child to be their friend, which is ridiculous.

@earl-of-trumps said
Did the children consent to being groomed?

This is where parental guidance comes into play.

The "grooming" thingy is another example of right wingers making s**t up. You don't have the slightest evidence that these type of shows are doing any such thing; it's just a concoction based on your weird stereotypes (like Wajoma believing draq queens can't have children). Of course, actual pedophiles shouldn't be in close contact with children, but that's something parole boards should enforce on convicted sexual predators not something to be assumed about people solely based on puritanical, prudish bigotry.

In the other thread you said parents who brought their kids to such shows should be arrested; where's the room for "parental guidance" there?

@no1marauder said
The "grooming" thingy is another example of right wingers making s**t up. You don't have the slightest evidence that these type of shows are doing any such thing; it's just a concoction based on your weird stereotypes (like Wajoma believing draq queens can't have children). Of course, actual pedophiles shouldn't be in close contact with children, but that's something par ...[text shortened]... brought their kids to such shows should be arrested; where's the room for "parental guidance" there?

There you are with that 'evidence' requirement. I think the Forum gives leeway to the opinions of others. My opinions are generally based on your liberal movements, abounding, to make all of the societal transformations which are underway as I speak.
THAT, Marauder, is evidence. So, it follows that a little innocent visit to old men strippin' and struttin' in the face of children qualifies as evidence under the veil of ....entertainment? What is it for, c'mon,,,,,Marauder? And why defend it?

@averagejoe1 said
There you are with that 'evidence' requirement. I think the Forum gives leeway to the opinions of others. My opinions are generally based on your liberal movements, abounding, to make all of the societal transformations which are underway as I speak.
THAT, Marauder, is evidence. So, it follows that a little innocent visit to old men strippin' and struttin' in the fa ...[text shortened]... idence under the veil of ....entertainment? What is it for, c'mon,,,,,Marauder? And why defend it?

Yes, I'm not a gullible right winger who believes everything Breitbart or Fox News or whatever propaganda outlet you guys slavishly digest; I do require actual evidence.

Defending or attacking what other people do for entertainment isn't my thing; I accept it's NOMFB and move on. It doesn't matter what I think about it personally; unlike the wannabe members of the US version of the Guidance Police here (that includes fake "libertarians" Earl and Wajoma) I don't think my views on personal morality should be codified in the Penal Law.

@no1marauder said
Yes, I'm not a gullible right winger who believes everything Breitbart or Fox News or whatever propaganda outlet you guys slavishly digest; I do require actual evidence.

Defending or attacking what other people do for entertainment isn't my thing; I accept it's NOMFB and move on. It doesn't matter what I think about it personally; unlike the wannabe members of the US v ...[text shortened]... s" Earl and Wajoma) I don't think my views on personal morality should be codified in the Penal Law.

I’m not going to look backwards at all of the posts, but I don’t think any one of them has to do with propaganda of the news and media. I think the issue is about drag queens??

Do you see, you are doing it again…. now you are trying to shift us into discussing the media. I thought we were going to decide if it’s OK for children to be at drag shows, or should parents not have a say so. Isn’t that what we are discussing.
Let us have an experiment. Marauder will answer yes or no, without links, or referring to the media. This is a big moment.