29 Dec 05
Originally posted by flexmoremabey some have ideas they think would hold more purpose...i disagree.
if he is truly bad then it is not about him ... it is about the rest of the world ...
are there bad parts of the world that help people like him?
he can help us find them.
shoot him and then send him home to his family and friends so they can mourn his death.surley setting an example like this which best fits the crimes he done-death- is the best way to stop others from continuing in their acts of terrorism.in a court of law you are innocent untill proven guilty...we all know this is proven...shoot him.
for those further down the line a court process would hold purpose as most all of them who killed people were held under the system he created.some may have played party to murders(without knowing) yet others should also be shot.
29 Dec 05
Originally posted by CliffLandinhis crimes could be ignorance towards those innocent people who died while he has tried to defend his country.ignorance here in N.Z. in some cases is a crime.he and other Americans should show more respect towards the innocent people all around the world they have killed.
You mean Allah I think. And what about what George W. has done? Should we shoot him too?
anyone in a position of power gets to take most of the blame for what those under them do.if proven in a court of law the crimes of those under him is punishable by death...then shoot them too.
...i have been talking about the thread started.
29 Dec 05
Originally posted by windmillBy this reasoning then any leader of any nation that allows people to starve to death or freeze to death would be guilty of ignorance towards those innocent people who died. Fortunately for the leaders of the world this type of crap doesn't make it into court.
his crimes could be ignorance towards those innocent people who died while he has tried to defend his country.ignorance here in N.Z. in some cases is a crime.he and other Americans should show more respect towards the innocent people all around the world they have killed.
anyone in a position of power gets to take most of the blame for what those u ...[text shortened]... ble by death...then shoot them too.
...i have been talking about the thread started.
A couple of things, because it is driving me crazy. Mabey is spelled maybe and surley is spelled surely. I don't mean to belittle you, I just feel your posts would be taken more seriously if you spelled everything right. I am dyslexic and misspell things all the time, but I try my hardest to spell things correctly.
30 Dec 05
Originally posted by CliffLandinstarvation and war are 2 diff things....chalk and chess.
By this reasoning then any leader of any nation that allows people to starve to death or freeze to death would be guilty of ignorance towards those innocent people who died. Fortunately for the leaders of the world this type of crap doesn't make it into court.
A couple of things, because it is driving me crazy. Mabey is spelled maybe and surley is spe ...[text shortened]... am dyslexic and misspell things all the time, but I try my hardest to spell things correctly.
30 Dec 05
Originally posted by windmillBy that logic the King of England should have been tried after WWII for the people that died during the Blitz. Or Stalin should have been tried for the people that died while he tried to defend Stalingrad.
starvation and war are 2 diff things....chalk and chess.
30 Dec 05
1 edit
Originally posted by CliffLandini guess ignorance is only a crime for some people?lol...you argue my point.
By that logic the King of England should have been tried after WWII for the people that died during the Blitz. Or Stalin should have been tried for the people that died while he tried to defend Stalingrad.