Why does not a liberal start a thread on this? After all, it is YOUR FBI. FBI is caught up in the politically-motivated raid, my, my. And, NOW, we find what Zuckerberg announced, out of his own mouth.
Hell, I find you fellers complicit as well. Note that Trump WANTS the whole warrant released. Why do libs want to redact stuff. Didn't Biden mention transparency and bringing everyone together in his inaugural speech????
Losers and pansies all. Toughen up, children. Put it all on the table. The lap top, the raid manuscripts!!!!!!
https://www.newsweek.com/zuckerberg-hunter-biden-facebook-fbiwhat-we-do-know-what-we-dont-1737449
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147484
@averagejoe1 saidliberal crickets!
Why does not a liberal start a thread on this? After all, it is YOUR FBI. FBI is caught up in the politically-motivated raid, my, my. And, NOW, we find what Zuckerberg announced, out of his own mouth.
Hell, I find you fellers complicit as well. Note that Trump WANTS the whole warrant released. Why do libs want to redact stuff. Didn't Biden mention transparency ...[text shortened]...
https://www.newsweek.com/zuckerberg-hunter-biden-facebook-fbiwhat-we-do-know-what-we-dont-1737449
27 Aug 22
@AverageJoe1
You seriously think a distraction like this is some kind of vindication of a traitorous X POTUS? The redacted warrant says some of those TS docs had TRUMP'S WRITING on them.
Where is your cry for justice about the loss of TOP SECRET and TS/CSI docs?
So now BEAUSE IT IS TRUMP, national security is out the frigging WINDOW?
Is that how you hang now?
27 Aug 22
@averagejoe1 saidLiterally anything to avoid facing the truth.
Why does not a liberal start a thread on this? After all, it is YOUR FBI. FBI is caught up in the politically-motivated raid, my, my. And, NOW, we find what Zuckerberg announced, out of his own mouth.
Hell, I find you fellers complicit as well. Note that Trump WANTS the whole warrant released. Why do libs want to redact stuff. Didn't Biden mention transparency ...[text shortened]...
https://www.newsweek.com/zuckerberg-hunter-biden-facebook-fbiwhat-we-do-know-what-we-dont-1737449
My, my, how deep your rabbit hole is.
27 Aug 22
@sonhouse saidHow do you know all of this ahead of everyone else? You got an inside track, obviously. Enlighten us, with facts, further.
@AverageJoe1
You seriously think a distraction like this is some kind of vindication of a traitorous X POTUS? The redacted warrant says some of those TS docs had TRUMP'S WRITING on them.
Where is your cry for justice about the loss of TOP SECRET and TS/CSI docs?
So now BEAUSE IT IS TRUMP, national security is out the frigging WINDOW?
Is that how you hang now?
27 Aug 22
@averagejoe1 saidUh… judge… warrant… etc.
How do you know all of this ahead of everyone else? You got an inside track, obviously. Enlighten us, with facts, further.
27 Aug 22
@sonhouse saidIs that how you hang now?
@AverageJoe1
You seriously think a distraction like this is some kind of vindication of a traitorous X POTUS? The redacted warrant says some of those TS docs had TRUMP'S WRITING on them.
Where is your cry for justice about the loss of TOP SECRET and TS/CSI docs?
So now BEAUSE IT IS TRUMP, national security is out the frigging WINDOW?
Is that how you hang now?
He never did hang; he sticks out a little little bit.
@averagejoe1 saidDear Joe -
Why does not a liberal start a thread on this? After all, it is YOUR FBI. FBI is caught up in the politically-motivated raid, my, my. And, NOW, we find what Zuckerberg announced, out of his own mouth.
Hell, I find you fellers complicit as well. Note that Trump WANTS the whole warrant released. Why do libs want to redact stuff. Didn't Biden mention transparency ...[text shortened]...
https://www.newsweek.com/zuckerberg-hunter-biden-facebook-fbiwhat-we-do-know-what-we-dont-1737449
1. Search warrant affidavits are almost never made public before charges and often remain permanently under seal if charges are never filed. However, once prosecutors open a criminal case, any warrant affidavits used during the inquiry will generally be turned over to the defense — though not in a public manner — as part of the discovery process.
2. It was a Federal Judge who approved these redactions, not "You Libs"
3. Donald Trump doesn't get to decide what is released
4. Joe Biden is not the Attorney General and does not run the Justice Department
5. Neither Mark Zuckerberg nor Facebook had anything to do with Donald Trump stealing these boxes of Government documents and illegally taking them to his home
Your nonsensical rant is 100% wrong. I feel embarrassed for you. Aren't you ashamed to put such ignorance in display for all to see like this? 😲
27 Aug 22
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidWhy does/did Trump want to release state secrets? There are intelligence operatives under cover in dangerous parts of the world that would have been exposed if some of those SCI documents had gotten out, and Trump was ready to sell them to the highest bidder. This was YOUR president, you idiots.
Why does not a liberal start a thread on this? After all, it is YOUR FBI. FBI is caught up in the politically-motivated raid, my, my. And, NOW, we find what Zuckerberg announced, out of his own mouth.
Hell, I find you fellers complicit as well. Note that Trump WANTS the whole warrant released. Why do libs want to redact stuff. Didn't Biden mention transparency ...[text shortened]...
https://www.newsweek.com/zuckerberg-hunter-biden-facebook-fbiwhat-we-do-know-what-we-dont-1737449
I don't give half a rat's ass about Facebook. It can die in a fire as far as I care.
27 Aug 22
@averagejoe1 saidWhat’s the issue here?
Why does not a liberal start a thread on this? After all, it is YOUR FBI. FBI is caught up in the politically-motivated raid, my, my. And, NOW, we find what Zuckerberg announced, out of his own mouth.
Hell, I find you fellers complicit as well. Note that Trump WANTS the whole warrant released. Why do libs want to redact stuff. Didn't Biden mention transparency ...[text shortened]...
https://www.newsweek.com/zuckerberg-hunter-biden-facebook-fbiwhat-we-do-know-what-we-dont-1737449
The FBI warned Facebook to be wary of Russian interference and hacks on their platform prior to the 2020 election.
So what?
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147484
27 Aug 22
@shavixmir saidwas not a judge…had no legal authority to sign warrant
Uh… judge… warrant… etc.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147484
27 Aug 22
@divegeester saidnot quite, you libs keep looking worse and worse.
What’s the issue here?
The FBI warned Facebook to be wary of Russian interference and hacks on their platform prior to the 2020 election.
So what?
27 Aug 22
@mott-the-hoople saidI’m not a “lib”, whatever that is.
not quite, you libs keep looking worse and worse.
So explain then, in clear and concise terms exactly what the issue is and with reference to what is posted in that news article to back it up?
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147484
@divegeester saidnever seen a lib that would admit it.
I’m not a “lib”, whatever that is.
So explain then, in clear and concise terms exactly what the issue is and with reference to what is posted in that news article to back it up?
Evidence is out that doj/fbi suppressed hunter biden info…dont play dumb
27 Aug 22
@averagejoe1 saidback the blue
Why does not a liberal start a thread on this? After all, it is YOUR FBI. FBI is caught up in the politically-motivated raid, my, my. And, NOW, we find what Zuckerberg announced, out of his own mouth.
Hell, I find you fellers complicit as well. Note that Trump WANTS the whole warrant released. Why do libs want to redact stuff. Didn't Biden mention transparency ...[text shortened]...
https://www.newsweek.com/zuckerberg-hunter-biden-facebook-fbiwhat-we-do-know-what-we-dont-1737449