@mott-the-hoople saidKind of interesting how the anti-FBI narrative sounds a lot like "defund the police".
liberal crickets!
Maybe that explains the silence.
@mott-the-hoople saidI don’t see that written in the Newsweek article you linked to.
Evidence is out that doj/fbi suppressed hunter biden info…dont play dumb
@mchill saidBut we see things differently, give it a break. For instance, some among you think that one of us should pay the bills of another of us. And that is just for starters. And that is a fact statement, unlike the generalities that you throw out, and statements of what the laws are, which laws are rife with a whole lot of different interpretations.
Dear Joe -
1. Search warrant affidavits are almost never made public before charges and often remain permanently under seal if charges are never filed. However, once prosecutors open a criminal case, any warrant affidavits used during the inquiry will generally be turned over to the defense — though not in a public manner — as part of the discovery process.
2. It was a ...[text shortened]... embarrassed for you. Aren't you ashamed to put such ignorance in display for all to see like this? 😲
In your first paragraph above, you use the word almost, the word if, the word generally. How does that make any definitive points?
I feel embarrassed for you, you should be ashamed, your ignorance is showing.🤡
Edit: The airwaves today are loaded with one talking head after another, each explaining whether or not certain things should or could have happened at Margo. each explaining whether FBI and the creepy magistrate judge were right or not …..Which is it? If none of them can agree, how in the world do you think you know all about it??
Lawyer, are ‘ya? Well, I would say so what? These are lawyers that do not agree with each other!!. Isn’t that a gas!
So, I don’t agree with you.
I think maybe we have a chance here for some real consensus...
Libs want to decrease funding for the police and increased accountability.
Cons want to back the blue, even in cases of obvious police brutality. But now the blue comes after your anointed one then we need to talk about fairness and funding and accountability.
Everyone agrees now.
@wildgrass saidOh lord, just when I saw this hour’s video of one of the accepted culturalists in your society, beat the crap out of a passerby, and then his bro, replete with a hood on his head, sucker punch a 74 yr old lady. And you have to have a comment about police. Not a nice one.
I think maybe we have a chance here for some real consensus...
Libs want to decrease funding for the police and increased accountability.
Cons want to back the blue, even in cases of obvious police brutality. But now the blue comes after your anointed one then we need to talk about fairness and funding and accountability.
Everyone agrees now.
You know, we all want killer of George Floyd to suffer the same fate? We called it a bad Apple, an imperfect world. You gay lightfoots want a PEERRRFECT world.
Get your feet on the ground! Oops I have to go the IRS is knocking on my door
@averagejoe1 saidBut we see things differently, give it a break. For instance, some among you think that one of us should pay the bills of another of us.
But we see things differently, give it a break. For instance, some among you think that one of us should pay the bills of another of us. And that is just for starters. And that is a fact statement, unlike the generalities that you throw out, and statements of what the laws are, which laws are rife with a whole lot of different interpretations.
In your first paragraph ...[text shortened]... efinitive points?
I feel embarrassed for you, you should be ashamed, your ignorance is showing.🤡
Joe - Your post was not about paying bills. It was about the FBI and the redactions on the affidavit. As soon as someone proves you wrong (which was pretty easy) you change the subject to paying bills. 😵
@Mott-The-Hoople
So that excuses the fact Trump stole hundreds of secret and TS and TS/SCI docs?
Does it matter to you people's lives could be in danger if what is revealed got to the wrong country? Does national security mean NOTHING to you now?
@sonhouse said -
Where is your cry for justice about the loss of TOP SECRET and TS/CSI docs?
------------------------
Why don't you aim your angst at the person/s that take the biggest share of the blame, the National Archives??
How the heck did the "Secure Facility" lose track of these important documents???
You are so obviously prejudiced that it is scary. Witch hunt material.
@Earl-of-Trumps
Yeah, some witch hunt. TRUMP HAS THE DOCUMENTS IDIOT.
It doesn't matter a WHIT who gave them to him, he TOOK THEM TO ML.
THAT alone makes it a felony.
Yep, witch hunt. CLEARLY you hate the US so much you don't care WHO dies if that information gets in the wrong hands.
AND you know good and well, as I have said about 4 times before, if it had been Clinton or Biden running off with TS docs you would scream TRAITOR about 1 minute after you would have heard such.
But you never answer THAT charge because you are a FLAMING HYPOCRITE.
AND an idiot.
@Earl-of-Trumps
Oh maven of all things political, why don't you tell US why Trump stored those docs in his basement and 3 OTHER rooms at ML.
Trump is NOT authorized to steal TS docs. NO Ex POTUS can do that. AND BTW, in order to declassify them he has to make it official in writing and he never did that and his aids attest to that.
Besides that, the warrant does not even MENTION the level of secrecy of ANY of those docs, so it matters not at all if Trump was telling the truth and HAD declassified them.
The fact he had those docs and REFUSED to give them up for MONTHS means he is complicit in SEVERAL felonies.
I also have ZERO doubt if and when Trump is indicted for the espionage act you and the rest of the ultrarightwingnut zombies will just make Trump a martyr.
Even vote for him if he is in prison.
WOMEN are the ones going to save us from the loss of democracy and the insertion of the party previously referred to as the republican party which it is NOT any more, sticking in an Authoritarian if they get their chance because they have ONE agenda and ONE only, getting power ANY WAY THEY CAN and if it means we lose democracy here, so be it from their POV.
@sonhouse saidNo one knows the basis for this Post Sonhouse. It refers to no other post,, no other issue, no other question. You fail to hit quote, and not likely we will search for Mott's ;post. Downer.
@Mott-The-Hoople
So that excuses the fact Trump stole hundreds of secret and TS and TS/SCI docs?
Does it matter to you people's lives could be in danger if what is revealed got to the wrong country? Does national security mean NOTHING to you now?