Z'berg says WH made him censor Americans

@vivify said
You make it quite difficult to not insult your intelligence.

I didn't condone it. I clearly said it's legitimate to think what Biden did was wrong. So what's your problem?

Because you did not say you think it is wrong. You only say it's legitimate to think that. Apparently when Trump abuses the same power you will say it is wrong then and not before then. You condone it while Biden is doing it.

@Metal-Brain said
Because you did not say you think it is wrong. You only say it's legitimate to think that. Apparently when Trump abuses the same power you will say it is wrong then and not before then. You condone it while Biden is doing it.

Intent is what matters. Was the intent self-serving or based on facts regarding public safety? The question is whether Biden's intent was the latter.

Zuck claims the White House pressured FB to censor Hunter Biden content. If true, that was wrong and a conflict of interest.

@vivify said
Intent is what matters. Was the intent self-serving or based on facts regarding public safety? The question is whether Biden's intent was the latter.

Zuck claims the White House pressured FB to censor Hunter Biden content. If true, that was wrong and a conflict of interest.

“. If true, that was wrong and a conflict of interest.”

😂. “if true”

damn are you stupid or what? zukerburg admitted it was true

@Mott-The-Hoople said
“. If true, that was wrong and a conflict of interest.”

😂. “if true”

damn are you stupid or what? zukerburg admitted it was true

Zuck claimed it was true. That's not an admission of fact.

Will you admit Trump is a rapist because a woman he lost a court case to said so?

@vivify said
Zuck claimed it was true. That's not an admission of fact.

Will you admit Trump is a rapist because a woman he lost a court case to said so?

Trump?
Anyway, Zuck did not 'claim' it, a poor choice of words for such a great debater.
He STATED it as a fact. So your saying that it is not an 'admission of fact' is also stupid, sorry. Here is now you can redeem yourself......What would be an honest no-crap way to say what he did, what 'they' did?

Join the ranks of debaters.

@vivify said
Zuck claimed it was true. That's not an admission of fact.

Will you admit Trump is a rapist because a woman he lost a court case to said so?

utterly stupid...

if Trump said so, yes I would believe it.

You are taking what someone says about themselves and trying to equate it to what someone says about someone else LOL

@Mott-The-Hoople said
if Trump said so, yes I would believe it.

And now you see the problem with just accepting Zuck's claim as fact. You believe it only because you support Trump and oppose his rivals.

If Zuck said Trump tried to pressure him, you would not believe it. Correct?

@AverageJoe1 said
Trump?
Anyway, Zuck did not 'claim' it, a poor choice of words for such a great debater.
He STATED it as a fact. So your saying that it is not an 'admission of fact' is also stupid, sorry. Here is now you can redeem yourself......What would be an honest no-crap way to say what he did, what 'they' did?

Join the ranks of debaters.

I say vivfly licks horses asses...by their logic it is true

@AverageJoe1 said
Trump?
Anyway, Zuck did not 'claim' it, a poor choice of words for such a great debater.
He STATED it as a fact.

That's not how facts work. Zuck saying it's a fact doesn't make it so. Does he have evidence backing up his statement? Any documents, emails, recordings, etc., that he can make public?

If not, it's just a claim. Not a "fact".

@vivify said
And now you see the problem with just accepting Zuck's claim as fact. You believe it only because you support Trump and oppose his rivals.

If Zuck said Trump tried to pressure him, you would not believe it. Correct?

a person admitting they did something is considered to be true in a normal persons world...I pity you, it must be terrible not knowing reality...there will never be any satisfaction

@vivify said
That's not how facts work. Zuck saying it's a fact doesn't make it so. Does he have evidence backing up his statement? Any documents, emails, recordings, etc., that he can make public?

If not, it's just a claim. Not a "fact".

it happened, that is a fact

zuckerberg stated the biden admin asked him to do it, that is a fact

do you have any facts to dispute this?

@Mott-The-Hoople said
a person admitting they did something is considered to be true in a normal persons world...I pity you, it must be terrible not knowing reality...there will never be any satisfaction

Lol you're a MAGA. Suckers and losers? True?

How about the guy at Arlington cemetery who admitted that he was assaulted by Trump's campaign because he asked them not to hold a campaign event with photographs in front of dead soldiers graves? Smiling and giving the thumbs up standing on heroes graves?

For this one we have photos.

Generally considered to be true? It seems like MAGA world does not agree with you.

@vivify said
That's not how facts work. Zuck saying it's a fact doesn't make it so. Does he have evidence backing up his statement? Any documents, emails, recordings, etc., that he can make public?

If not, it's just a claim. Not a "fact".

Do you have evidence backing up the lib claim that Trump called our troops losers? Do you have evidence of that, little feller? You do not, so that is why you are a little feller. But as a little feller, you find great group-comfort on the forum.
Now get off it and grow into a real debater. We would appreciate it. You and Sonhouse et al are so laborious.

@AverageJoe1 said
Do you have evidence backing up the lib claim that Trump called our troops losers?

I never claimed Trump said that. This is called a strawman, where you attack someone for something they never said. This is a dishonest tactic but you're an intellectual midget, so it's not surprising.

Here's something we do know Trump said about troops captured during war:

https://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/trump-attacks-mccain-i-like-people-who-werent-captured-120317

Trump attacks McCain: ‘I like people who weren’t captured’

@Mott-The-Hoople said
it happened, that is a fact

zuckerberg stated the biden admin asked him to do it, that is a fact

do you have any facts to dispute this?

If Zuck stating something is true makes it fact, then that woman stating Trump raped her is also fact, right?

Unless Zuck provides something backing up his claim regarding Hunter content, it's not "fact".