Originally posted by lauseyAnd, I just realised that in some cases reproduction is a bad thing even.
Maybe Mother Teresa isn't the best of examples, but there have been many people who have not had kids, whom have dedicated their lives to improving the quality of other people's lives, and for future generations.
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundMother Teresa was the leader of a death cult and did nothing to deserve her nobel peace prize or her mystic/saintly praise. She was vehemently against abortion and birth control... apparently she saw no connection between over population and poverty. What happened to the millions of $ she received, it sure as Hell wasn't pumped into her 'hospital' operation.
Originally posted by Arrakis
[b]Ah, but even a crack whore who gave birth is more important and more successful in life than a person who could not reproduce their genes.
So, who is/was more important ? Mother Terresa, or a crack whore ?[/b]
Mother Teresa = Myth = Less valuable than a crack whore's coochy.