Go back
A world of......change

A world of......change

General

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120562
Clock
26 Feb 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Change #1

In this new world order of debt, torture, STDs, obamaisms and "change", the next James Bond should be a black celebate lesbian muslim pacifist who unites east and west.

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37384
Clock
27 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by divegeester
Change #1

In this new world order of debt, torture, STDs, obamaisms and "change", the next James Bond should be a black celebate lesbian muslim pacifist who unites east and west.
James Bond, or Jane Bond?

Great Big Stees

Joined
14 Mar 04
Moves
186286
Clock
27 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
James Bond, or Jane Bond?
How 'bout Jamie?

huckleberryhound
Devout Agnostic.

DZ-015

Joined
12 Oct 05
Moves
42584
Clock
27 Feb 09

Originally posted by Great Big Stees
How 'bout Jamie?
Jamhin muhammed kalib.......bond.

m
Ajarn

Wat?

Joined
16 Aug 05
Moves
76863
Clock
27 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Change #1

Post in the style of GB.... 😛

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37384
Clock
27 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by huckleberryhound
Jamhin muhammed kalib.......bond.
lmao!

d

Joined
05 Jan 04
Moves
45179
Clock
27 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Suzianne
James Bond, or Jane Bond?
James Bondage

Seitse
Doug Stanhope

That's Why I Drink

Joined
01 Jan 06
Moves
33672
Clock
27 Feb 09

If we could reduce the world’s population to a village of precisely 100 people, with all existing human ratios remaining the same, the demographics would look something like this:

The village would have 60 Asians, 14 Africans, 12 Europeans, 8 Latin Americans, 5 from the USA and Canada, and 1 from the South Pacific

51 would be male, 49 would be female

82 would be non-white; 18 white

67 would be non-Christian; 33 would be Christian

80 would live in substandard housing

67 would be unable to read

50 would be malnourished and 1 dying of starvation

33 would be without access to a safe water supply

39 would lack access to improved sanitation

24 would not have any electricity (And of the 76 that do
have electricity, most would only use it for light at night.)

7 people would have access to the Internet

1 would have a college education

1 would have HIV

2 would be near birth; 1 near death

5 would control 32% of the entire world’s wealth; all 5 would be US citizens

33 would be receiving --and attempting to live on-- only 3% of the income of “the village”

Great Big Stees

Joined
14 Mar 04
Moves
186286
Clock
27 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
[b]If we could reduce the world’s population to a village of precisely 100 people, with all existing human ratios remaining the same, the demographics would look something like this:


2 would be near birth; 1 near death
I see a world population problem here in the distant future.

A Unique Nickname

Joined
10 Jan 08
Moves
19036
Clock
27 Feb 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
If we could reduce the world’s population to a village of precisely 100 people, with all existing human ratios remaining the same, the demographics would look something like this:

The village would have 60 Asians, 14 Africans, 12 Europeans, 8 Latin Americans, 5 from the USA and Canada, and 1 from the South Pacific

51 would be male, 49 would be female
...[text shortened]... ns

33 would be receiving --and attempting to live on-- only 3% of the income of “the village”
nice post.

Mctayto
Highlander

Planet Earth

Joined
10 Dec 04
Moves
1044651
Clock
02 Mar 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
If we could reduce the world’s population to a village of precisely 100 people, with all existing human ratios remaining the same, the demographics would look something like this:

The village would have 60 Asians, 14 Africans, 12 Europeans, 8 Latin Americans, 5 from the USA and Canada, and 1 from the South Pacific

51 would be male, 49 would be female
...[text shortened]... ns

33 would be receiving --and attempting to live on-- only 3% of the income of “the village”
So are you suggestion mass genocide or simply for the Asian community as you feel hard done by being a European ?

S
Prof.

Blighty

Joined
05 Jun 07
Moves
137855
Clock
03 Mar 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Seitse
If we could reduce the world’s population to a village of precisely 100 people, with all existing human ratios remaining the same, the demographics would look something like this:

The village would have 60 Asians, 14 Africans, 12 Europeans, 8 Latin Americans, 5 from the USA and Canada, and 1 from the South Pacific

51 would be male, 49 would be female
...[text shortened]... ns

33 would be receiving --and attempting to live on-- only 3% of the income of “the village”
Thank you for putting my own life a little bit better in to perspective. It doesn't suck half as badly as it could do.

Rec'd

Busygirl
The BOSS

in my own mind.

Joined
03 Nov 08
Moves
78449
Clock
03 Mar 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by surtism
Thank you for putting my own life a little bit better in to perspective. It doesn't suck half as badly as it could do.

Rec'd
You said it!

P
Banned from edits

Grammar dyslexic

Joined
20 May 05
Moves
11372
Clock
03 Mar 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Busygirl
You said it!
He said it?

Busygirl
The BOSS

in my own mind.

Joined
03 Nov 08
Moves
78449
Clock
03 Mar 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PocketKings
He said it?
He said the following about Seitse's excellent post:

Thank you for putting my own life a little bit better in to perspective. It doesn't suck half as badly as it could do.

Rec'd


I was agreeing with both of them.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.