31 Jul 16
Originally posted by FMFBecause you're the one making a big, fat, hairy deal about it, only to deride them.
Exactly. Who cares. But the fact that robbie carrobie, chaney3, GHOSTHUNTER, FreakyKBH care enough about it to slip it into the banter makes it an issue that they have inserted into the conversation, not me. If it's "a complete non-issue" why is it me you're tackling about it, and not them?
The fact is that you brought cheney3 into this ego maelstrom of yours. The least you could do is apologize. This is another failed tactic of yours, the casual name-dropping.
31 Jul 16
Originally posted by SuzianneHow am I making " big, fat, hairy deal about it"? I simply said:
Because you're the one making a big, fat, hairy deal about it, only to deride them.
The fact is that you brought cheney3 into this ego maelstrom of yours. The least you could do is apologize. This is another failed tactic of yours, the casual name-dropping.
"Oh dear. Straight out of the robbie carrobie-chaney3-GHOSTHUNTER playbook."
I mentioned chaney3 because it's the sort of thing he does. Same goes for robbie and GHOSTHUNTER.
31 Jul 16
Originally posted by FMFYour hypocrisy lies in the whole "free speech" tactic you used as an excuse not to alert posts while simultaneously calling others hypocrites that you mysteriously did not include in this post.
Me:
I didn't alert any posts and nor did I criticize the Moderators for not deleting them.
You:
You didn't alert any posts and I yet you did criticize the Moderators for not deleting them.
One of these two stances is hypocritical. And it's yours, not mine.
And who said I didn't alert any posts? I simply refused your egomaniacal demand to show them to you. Frankly, which posts I alerted is none of your business. Why don't you ask your pal Russ?
31 Jul 16
Originally posted by FMFYou call in others so that your own hypocrisy seems normal. Well, maybe it does to you.
How am I making " big, fat, hairy deal about it"? I simply said:
"Oh dear. Straight out of the robbie carrobie-chaney3-GHOSTHUNTER playbook."
I mentioned chaney3 because it's the sort of thing he does. Same goes for robbie and GHOSTHUNTER.
People don't appreciate being used, which is what I said at that moment. This casual name-dropping you do isn't funny, and frankly, it's not working for you. You really do think so little of other users here, don't you?
31 Jul 16
Originally posted by SuzianneThank you Suzianne.
Because you're the one making a big, fat, hairy deal about it, only to deride them.
The fact is that you brought cheney3 into this ego maelstrom of yours. The least you could do is apologize. This is another failed tactic of yours, the casual name-dropping.
I have recently argued with FMF in the spirituality forum...but it's now past 1:30am here on the east coast...and I'm too tired to argue.
31 Jul 16
Originally posted by SuzianneOn the contrary, "the whole free speech tactic" was in fact a principle which underpinned my policy of not alerting posts.
Your hypocrisy lies in the whole "free speech" tactic you used as an excuse not to alert posts while simultaneously calling others hypocrites that you mysteriously did not include in this post.
Originally posted by SuzianneYou have made accusations that the Moderators did not delete posts that you think they should have deleted. If you refuse to say which posts these were - and subject your opinion as to what ought to have been deleted [but wasn't] to scrutiny - then your accusations are empty, unsubstantiated, and unkind to those who volunteer to keep this site running.
And who said I didn't alert any posts? I simply refused your egomaniacal demand to show them to you. Frankly, which posts I alerted is none of your business.
31 Jul 16
Originally posted by SuzianneWho is it I have "used"?
People don't appreciate being used, which is what I said at that moment. This casual name-dropping you do isn't funny, and frankly, it's not working for you. You really do think so little of other users here, don't you?
31 Jul 16
Originally posted by FMFLike... who? You? Is this why you're so upset? Over supposedly "empty" and "unsubstantiated" accusations? Hardly "empty" and "unsubstantiated" then, don't you think?
You have made accusations that the Moderators did not delete posts that you think they should have deleted. If you refuse to say which posts these were - and subject your opinion as to what ought to have been deleted [but wasn't] to scrutiny - then your accusations are empty, unsubstantiated, and unkind to those who volunteer to keep this site running.