Better Late Than Never

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Admittedly you do it in a more insidious manner, while Dive does so in a clumsy, direct fashion.

So you don't have an example of this: "Quite often you do it in the very first post"?

@fmf said
So you don't have an example of this: "Quite often you do it in the very first post"?

Okay, 'Thoughts on the recently departed.'

An OP all about Chaney.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Okay, 'Thoughts on the recently departed.'

An OP all about Chaney.

chaney3 and others. How was it "intended to score points or vent a lingering grudge"? I never abused chaney3 and never replied in kind to his abuse. No points scored on that thread and no lingering grudge. What's the problem there?

@fmf said
chaney3 and others. How was it "intended to score points or vent a lingering grudge"? I never abused chaney3 and never replied in kind to his abuse. No points scored on that thread and no lingering grudge. What's the problem there?

Why do you and Dive immediately revel in a player being banned from the site?

@fmf said
chaney3 and others. How was it "intended to score points or vent a lingering grudge"? I never abused chaney3 and never replied in kind to his abuse. No points scored on that thread and no lingering grudge. What's the problem there?

Lying on top of hypocrisy. You desperately need some new tricks.

@suzianne said
Oh, the hypocrisy.

The ironing is delicatessen.

Dam auto correct

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Why do you and Dive immediately revel in a player being banned from the site?

I didn't "revel".

Thread 195933

@suzianne said
Lying on top of hypocrisy. You desperately need some new tricks.

I am not lying.

@suzianne said
Lying on top of hypocrisy. You desperately need some new tricks.

Both Ghost of a Duke and I used to stand up to chaney3 and suggest he sleep it off when there was an issue. Both of us would converse with him when he was posting properly. Neither of us abused him.

@fmf said
I didn't "revel".

Thread 195933

If a poster got banned from the site it wouldn't even occur to me to create a new thread about them. You and Dive do it all the time.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
If a poster got banned from the site it wouldn't even occur to me to create a new thread about them. You and Dive do it all the time.

And yet you posted on that thread in pretty much the same spirit as I did. Neither of us was vindictive or "revelling".

@ghost-of-a-duke said
If a poster got banned from the site it wouldn't even occur to me to create a new thread about them. You and Dive do it all the time.

If a poster got banned from the site it wouldn't even occur to me to create a new thread about them.

The fact that you wouldn't enquire after a longstanding poster's disappearance does not make it wrong to do so.

@fmf said
So you don't have an example of this: "Quite often you do it in the very first post"?

Ghost of a Duke, do you have a better example? The chaney3 one did not withstand scutiny.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Why do you and Dive immediately revel in a player being banned from the site?

It’s a victory of socialism and decency.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
If a poster got banned from the site it wouldn't even occur to me to create a new thread about them. You and Dive do it all the time.

So what?