Originally posted by FMFwhodey: It was entitled, "Is Islam and mental illness a deadly combo?"
But if you've diagnosed "mental illness" as being behind the murder, what is the relevance of the religious affiliation? If the killer is [b]sane and murders someone for political or religious purposes then it is surely terrorism and cold blooded homicide.
But if the killer is, in fact, insane and murders someone, then surely the insanity will mea ...[text shortened]... case. Until it's shown to be so, we should treat what he did as a calculated terrorist atrocity.[/b]
you: But if you've diagnosed "mental illness" as being behind the murder...
me: It was a question, not a diagnoses.
The topic was deemed unfit for discussion so it was deleted. Therefore, your thoughts on this topic are unfit for discussion and should also be deleted.
10 Aug 14
Originally posted by lemon limeWell, I don't think so. The thread was probably deleted because of what certain people posted early in the thread. There are some people on the Debates Forum who take a degree of pleasure in posting stuff on topics like this that is sure to get deleted; it's a kind of fleeting mischievous delight, it seems ~ at least in their minds. If there were a few of such posts at the start, the thread would be doomed.
The topic ["Is Islam and mental illness a deadly combo?"] was deemed unfit for discussion so it was deleted. Therefore, your thoughts on this topic are unfit for discussion and should also be deleted.
whodey at first claimed it had been deleted because of its title. I asked him whether the PM from the web site owners specifically said it was being deleted because of the title. And he then admitted that they did not provide an in depth explanation.
I don't think either whodey's concern about the murder of Lee Rigby or my thoughts ~ in response ~ on mental illness, motivation and murder, are "unfit for discussion". Far from it. If you don't want to discuss what either of us has said, then just don't discuss it.
Originally posted by FMFIf there's one thing we've learned this week it's that Limeboy and logic are total strangers.
Well, I don't think so. The thread was probably deleted because of what certain people posted early in the thread. There are some people on the Debates Forum who take a degree of pleasure in posting stuff on topics like this that is sure to get deleted; it's a kind of fleeting mischievous delight, it seems ~ at least in their minds. If there were a few of such p ...[text shortened]... ar from it. If you don't want to discuss what either of us has said, then just don't discuss it.
Originally posted by FMFwhodey at first claimed it had been deleted because of its title. I asked him whether the PM from the web site owners specifically said it was being deleted because of the title. And he then admitted that they did not provide an in depth explanation.
Well, I don't think so. The thread was probably deleted because of what certain people posted early in the thread. There are some people on the Debates Forum who take a degree of pleasure in posting stuff on topics like this that is sure to get deleted; it's a kind of fleeting mischievous delight, it seems ~ at least in their minds. If there were a few of such p ...[text shortened]... ar from it. If you don't want to discuss what either of us has said, then just don't discuss it.
There was no second claim... whodey said it was deleted because of the title, period. How does not getting an in depth explanation of why it was deleted translate in your mind to mean it wasn't deleted because of the title?
10 Aug 14
Originally posted by lemon limeAt first, whodey claimed that it was deleted because of the title. It turned out he had not been told that. And it seems unlikely that that was the case. I said nothing about a 'first claim' or a 'second claim'. If you're not interested in talking about the role of mental illness in the death of Lee Rigby, feel free to post about other things. 🙂
There was no second claim... whodey said it was deleted because of the title, period. How does not getting an in depth explanation of why it was deleted translate in your mind to mean it wasn't deleted because of the title?
10 Aug 14
Originally posted by lemon limemental illness
whodey: [b]It was entitled, "Is Islam and mental illness a deadly combo?"
you: But if you've diagnosed "mental illness" as being behind the murder...
me: It was a question, not a diagnoses.
The topic was deemed unfit for discussion so it was deleted. Therefore, your thoughts on this topic are unfit for discussion and should also be deleted.[/b]
Originally posted by SuzianneNo, I am not trying to "bury it". Here it is again so that your suggestion is refuted: "I have only used the screen name 'Nick Bourbaki' here at RHP".
You do know that you and I aren't the only ones able to read this, right? Or are you going to take the chance that you can bury this page under another mountain of wind?
10 Aug 14
Originally posted by FMFUnder the Freedom of Movement Act men now have the right to wear baggy pants. No longer must we suffer in skinny jeans under the withering glare of feminist fashion police, for we have thrown off the shackles of effeminate scorn and are free to express ourselves as Nature intended.
At first, whodey claimed that it was deleted because of the title. It turned out he had not been told that. And it seems unlikely that that was the case. I said nothing about a 'first claim' or a 'second claim'. If you're not interested in talking about the role of mental illness in the death of Lee Rigby, feel free to post about other things. 🙂
10 Aug 14
Originally posted by lemon limefor we have thrown off the shackles of effeminate scorn and are free to express ourselves as Nature intended.
Under the Freedom of Movement Act men now have the right to wear baggy pants. No longer must we suffer in skinny jeans under the withering glare of feminist fashion police, for we have thrown off the shackles of effeminate scorn and are free to express ourselves as Nature intended.
yes my son, the Kilt!
10 Aug 14
Originally posted by robbie carrobie...the Kilt!
for we have thrown off the shackles of effeminate scorn and are free to express ourselves as Nature intended.
yes my son, the Kilt!
I'm still mulling over that one, but for now one step at a time...
One small step for man, one giant leap for Mens rights!
Hurrah!
By the way, what kind of porridge is carried in that pouch you mentioned? I eat oatmeal porridge almost everyday for breakfast. And I prefer rye bread to wheat or other grains.
Originally posted by lemon limerolled oats, we boil them in half water and half milk and serve with salt, kids and wussies take it with sugar.
[b]...the Kilt!
I'm still mulling over that one, but for now one step at a time...
One small step for man, one giant leap for Mens rights!
Hurrah!
By the way, what kind of porridge is carried in that pouch you mentioned? I eat oatmeal porridge almost everyday for breakfast. And I prefer rye bread to wheat or other grains.[/b]