@fmf saidI agree.
Why would Suzianne's accusation need to be deleted? She is who she is and she posts what she posts. Just let it be there for people to see. Same goes for all my posts going all the way back. I wouldn't want Suzianne to be banned for posting what she did. I think people should have access to the kind of stuff she says.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhy are you trying so hard to run interference for Suzianne? Let her express herself? Let her take responsibility for what she says.
Are you or Dive familiar with General Data Protection Regulation?
@fmf saidI recommend you answer the following question and confirm that you have taken it on board:
Why are you trying so hard to run interference for Suzianne? Let her express herself? Let her take responsibility for what she says.
Are you or Dive familiar with General Data Protection Regulation?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidBill and I make five hours of radio a week, five different shows. Which shows are you going to try to sabotage this time?
Are you or Dive familiar with General Data Protection Regulation?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYou are trolling me.
I recommend you answer the following question and confirm that you have taken it on board:
Are you or Dive familiar with General Data Protection Regulation?
@fmf saidThis is your last opportunity. I recommend you answer the following question and confirm that you have taken it on board:
Bill and I make five hours of radio a week, five different shows. Which shows are you going to try to sabotage this time?
Are you or Dive familiar with General Data Protection Regulation?
@ponderable saidNo one, least of all me, is asking for Suzianne to be banned, not even reprimanded.
In fact @Ponderable is asking not to create thread after thread to kep that warm. If the powers that be see any reason to ban Suzianne they will be more inclined by a private message than by threads in the GF:
Her post which I referred to, is a bother of her vitriolic angry triggers, stemming from her own twisted sense of injustice, and based on her being completely and utterly wrong about me.
I think she’s an unpleasant but comedic character who can’t be taken seriously and who’s ludicrous life claims deserve to treated with disdain.
You are NEVER calling her out for the abuse she flings at people on a weekly basis, and yet here you are picking me up for reframing an accusation made against myself.
It a pity to see you descend into this partisan behaviour Ponderable.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidDo you think Suzianne should have taken her claim about bribery to Russ and discuss it privately?
You should take this up privately with Russ and not discuss it here in public.
I may be wrong but I don’t remember you making a peep about it.
Funny that.
@divegeester saidAre you familiar with General Data Protection Regulation?
Do you think Suzianne should have taken her claim about bribery to Russ and discuss it privately?
I may be wrong but I don’t remember you making a peep about it.
Funny that.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidDid you privately advise Suzianne that she should remove her original claim against me and take it up privately with Russ?
Have you reconsidered leaving the GF?
@ponderable saidDid you privately advise Suzianne that she should remove her original claim against me and take it up privately with Russ?
To achieve that I also highly recommend to send feedback, rather than posting in the GF.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhat is this trolling for?
This is your last opportunity. I recommend you answer the following question and confirm that you have taken it on board:
Are you or Dive familiar with General Data Protection Regulation?
Have I upset you viz a viz Suzianne, again?
Listen: I am saying, DON'T delete her post; DON'T ban her; DON'T delete a thread where people are interacting regarding what she posted.