22 Sep 04
Neither Presidental candidates seem like the best the counrty has to offer. Does it seem to any of you that best among us have nothing to do with politics? It appears to be something like acting. You have to look the part to get in the running. If some brillant little ugly guy was to run for President, and had no personality, but he had the best ideas to come out of a human in years. He could change the world for the better with his marvelous ideas, but he does not fit the mold for the leader of the free world. It's a movie star world we live in. It's all about image.
22 Sep 04
Originally posted by buckkyYou do appear to be correct. I saw a bumper sticker the other day that I want; it said, "Bartlett is my President." I would love to have the people from the show in office and the people that run the show running everything. 🙂
Neither Presidental candidates seem like the best the counrty has to offer. Does it seem to any of you that best among us have nothing to do with politics? It appears to be something like acting. You have to look the part to get in the running. If some brillant little ugly guy was to run for President, and had no personality, but he had the best ideas to c ...[text shortened]... ld for the leader of the free world. It's a movie star world we live in. It's all about image.
~ Cheshire Cat 😀
22 Sep 04
Originally posted by buckkyAnd what part does Bush look? That of the village idiot? He sure doesn't look like anything remotely reassuring as far as I can see. I can't stand the sight of him, he physically repulses me. I have to turn the channel if he's on for more that five seconds at a time.
Neither Presidental candidates seem like the best the counrty has to offer. Does it seem to any of you that best among us have nothing to do with politics? It appears to be something like acting. You have to look the part to get in the running. If some brillant little ugly guy was to run for President, and had no personality, but he had the best ideas to c ...[text shortened]... ld for the leader of the free world. It's a movie star world we live in. It's all about image.
22 Sep 04
Originally posted by rwingettHe does look like the classic idiot. But he comes from a royal family, and he knows the right people. Or the wrong people. It's all how you look at it.
And what part does Bush look? That of the village idiot? He sure doesn't look like anything remotely reassuring as far as I can see. I can't stand the sight of him, he physically repulses me. I have to turn the channel if he's on for more that five seconds at a time.
22 Sep 04
Originally posted by rwingettI agree, Rob. He's unabashedly arrogant, and way, way, way out of touch with what is really going on in Iraq. He placates us with catchphrases like "We're making progress" and "We've turned a corner". Meanwhile, here in the real world, the man who is responsible for the worst crime ever on US soil is still at large, Iran is resuming their nuclear ambitions, and in Iraq there are 31 more potential hostage-beheading videos waiting to be made. Some progress.
And what part does Bush look? That of the village idiot? He sure doesn't look like anything remotely reassuring as far as I can see. I can't stand the sight of him, he physically repulses me. I have to turn the channel if he's on for more that five seconds at a time.
22 Sep 04
Originally posted by rwingettThe consensus now seems to be that Bush looks stupid in order to confuse and frighten his enemies (eg terrorists, liberals, the French), while reassuring some people that, despite his enormous wealth and connections, he's really an ordinary Joe at heart.
And what part does Bush look? That of the village idiot? He sure doesn't look like anything remotely reassuring as far as I can see. I can't stand the sight of him, he physically repulses me. I have to turn the channel if he's on for more that five seconds at a time.
22 Sep 04
1 edit
If some brillant little ugly guy was to run for President, and had no personality, but he had the best ideas to come out of a human in years. He could change the world for the better with his marvelous ideas, but he does not fit the mold for the leader of the free world. It's all about image.it is widely accepted that if the election campaigns had been televised instead of over radio that Roosevelt (IMO the best president of the 20th century, and the inventor of modern diplomacy) would never have been elected because he was in a wheelchair.
22 Sep 04
1 edit
Originally posted by belgianfreakI wonder, who was the last US president to even wear glasses in public?
it is widely accepted that if the leection campaigns had been televised instead of over radio that Roosevelt (IMO the best president of teh 20th century, and the inventor of modern diplomacy) would never have been elected because he was in a wheelchair.
- Joined
- 20 Oct 02
- Moves
- 601288
22 Sep 04
Originally posted by rwingettYeah! You know, thats the same exact way I feel about Kerry! Ever hear a more boring, double talking human? At least the man knew how to marry money so he could climb the ladder😵😵...cant stand the sight of him, have to change the channel when he shows up.
And what part does Bush look? That of the village idiot? He sure doesn't look like anything remotely reassuring as far as I can see. I can't stand the sight of him, he physically repulses me. I have to turn the channel if he's on for more that five seconds at a time.
22 Sep 04
Originally posted by buckkySo true man. What ever happened to the strong, silent type?
Neither Presidental candidates seem like the best the counrty has to offer. Does it seem to any of you that best among us have nothing to do with politics? It appears to be something like acting. You have to look the part to get in the running. If some brillant little ugly guy was to run for President, and had no personality, but he had the best ideas to c ...[text shortened]... ld for the leader of the free world. It's a movie star world we live in. It's all about image.