General
24 Apr 22
@very-rusty saidThanks for keeping us updated.
Personally I wouldn't say anything unless I didn't care if it was repeated in the public forum, especially to certain people.
@divegeester saidSnide remark acknowledged, I will file it with the rest of the garbage, then soon empty the garbage.
Thanks for keeping us updated.
-VR
@suzianne saidThe fact that Executioner Brand was talking to me on this forum [and I was alerting it] when he was making the posts accusing Muslims of being rapists and paedophiles ~ which caused him to be banned ~ does not create a "smell" off me that needs to be "removed". No one has suggested that "someone else" - as opposed to Executioner Brand himself - was responsible for his account being deleted.
Talk to your pal, he first suggested it was someone else, to remove the smell off of you two.
@very-rusty saidYour the one make “snide remarks” with all these unsubstantiated claims about people collecting personal data.
Snide remark acknowledged, I will file it with the rest of the garbage, then soon empty the garbage.
@divegeester saidLike your "unsubstantiated claims" that you keep files on people here?
Your the one make “snide remarks” with all these unsubstantiated claims about people collecting personal data.
Oh, so you were lying? Go figure. Pretty convenient.
@fmf saidAs I said, talk to your pal, not me. Please.
The fact that Executioner Brand was talking to me on this forum [and I was alerting it] when he was making the posts accusing Muslims of being rapists and paedophiles ~ which caused him to be banned ~ does not create a "smell" off me that needs to be "removed". No one has suggested that "someone else" - as opposed to Executioner Brand himself - was responsible for his account being deleted.
@shallow-blue saidYou obviously haven't heard him bragging about it, or perhaps you haven't been paying attention.
"Denial of guilt is an admission of guilt."
No. Dive claims not to have any files in the first place. I do not claim that he is telling the truth, but I your demand that he prove his innocence by providing the files he claims not to have is at least as disingenuous as his own claim of innocence. Frankly, it's downright Metal-Brainian.
@divegeester saidSo which is it?
Wow, that sounds like Planet of the Apes justice, right there!
@shallow-blue saidIn other words you're calling the geester a liar.
"Denial of guilt is an admission of guilt."
No. Dive claims not to have any files in the first place. I do not claim that he is telling the truth, but I your demand that he prove his innocence by providing the files he claims not to have is at least as disingenuous as his own claim of innocence. Frankly, it's downright Metal-Brainian.
I can't argue with that one. 🙂
-VR
@divegeester saidMany posts in these forums contain personal information, which users sometimes feel comfortable sharing. That you have continuously told people they are being monitored and copied here and threatened with some kind of "exposure" (implied, of course ), is beyond the pale, and it is utterly amazing that you haven't been held to task for this before now.
Posts on these forums is “personal information”?
I could care less than your barest minimum integrity that you hold copies of my posts. Of course I doubt you've recorded any of my posts calling out your nonsense, and in this sense, if you have any documentation of collected posts, I have no doubt that you have made sure they represent your own inflated view of your behavior. It's rather like trusting Donald Trump with writing his own biography. Works of fiction.
So why have you lied for all these years about collecting files on people here?
@very-rusty saidWhat he is doing is claiming that the person who reports a forest fire is "at least" as dangerous as the fire itself.
In other words you're calling the geester a liar.
I can't argue with that one. 🙂
-VR
@divegeester saidWe already know that you, and certain "friends" of yours, consider PMs to be "public" information, contrary to the opinion of the community at large.
Why would you assume that?