07 Mar 16
Originally posted by josephwI'm very surprised that you don't appreciate your true nature. Although come to think of it, components of aircraft wings don't tend to be known for their philosophical competence.
You're wrong. Divegeester was referring to the flap that allows cats and dogs into the house. Where's your self-awareness? Can't you understand English? 😉
07 Mar 16
1 edit
Originally posted by wolfgang59I don't think it's a sin.
Any animal not allowed in the house isn't a pet.
My dogs live in the house.
And yes .. we have to clean up after them........... 😞
But they would not be the same animals if they were not part of our pack!
My wife owns the interior of the house, and I'm allowed a certain amount of space. 😉
07 Mar 16
Originally posted by NoEarthlyReasonI never said I was all that competent. Truth be know I'm mostly intimidated by the education and intelligence of a lot of the posters in these forums. I just wish they would use their gifts and intellectual abilities toward more wholesome expressions of goodwill.
I'm very surprised that you don't appreciate your true nature. Although come to think of it, components of aircraft wings don't tend to be known for their philosophical competence.
07 Mar 16
Originally posted by FMFEven in imitation, you are a hack.
Putting to one side people who like both equally or who like neither (perhaps), what deductions or assumptions (whether they be spurious, serious, speculative... or whatever) can we make about the character and psychology of people who prefer dogs to cats and people who prefer cats to dogs.
07 Mar 16
1 edit
Originally posted by josephwI'm all for expressing goodwill, wholesomely and not, although personally I wouldn't find goodwill-only forums authentic or even healthy.
I never said I was all that competent. Truth be know I'm mostly intimidated by the education and intelligence of a lot of the posters in these forums. I just wish they would use their gifts and intellectual abilities toward more wholesome expressions of goodwill.