Originally posted by LittleBearHi Littlebear,
Hi Quirine!
Glad to see you again! πππ
That explains that serie of mates in 4 (or so)! π
Hope you are here again to stay!
Michael
In the end of august I'll pick up chess, maybe we can play then again. It's time I get lost of my zero-score against you...
I didn't look at the games ICTWizz and Cymro played; mates in 4? Then I'm surprised even they fell for the rating-boosting of one player...
Quirine
Originally posted by Liefhebberleifhebber = Qurine?
Hi Littlebear,
In the end of august I'll pick up chess, maybe we can play then again. It's time I get lost of my zero-score against you...
I didn't look at the games ICTWizz and Cymro played; mates in 4? Then I'm surprised even they fell for the rating-boosting of one player...
Quirine
Originally posted by redlentilsNormally I wouldnt waste my energy, but sometimes you just have to fight back! I couldnt really give monkey's wot redlentils thinks of me or my "morals" as I have done nothing wrong! I am, as he has noted, a paid up member of the site and have only recently got back into chess after a 12 year "absence" from the game and consider myself very much a novice, so I couldnt really give a monkeys about my rating as I have nothing to prove or lose! I have only one "ego" that being the aptly named "Tosser" as he calls it. If people like "Tosspot73" and "Copycat" want to just have a laugh and deliberately lose, thats not my problem, I'll gladly "play" them, So why dont you crawl back under the stone you came from and stop jumping to conclusions!.....π
cymro is a legitimate and strong player.
there are plenty of cheats out there who create alter egos to beat repeatedly e.g. the appropriately named "tosser" who, happily contributes to the site by buying a pawn star and then creates an opponent he can beat (and thus disrespecting the community he supports) again.. and again.. and again. my favourite ...[text shortened]... ose amongst us who sadly miss the whole point completely... hopefully they'll grow out of it π
Originally posted by TosserAnyone fooled into believing this guy has done nothing wrong should check out the 30 games he played against Tosspot.
Normally I wouldnt waste my energy, but sometimes you just have to fight back! I couldnt really give monkey's wot redlentils thinks of me or my "morals" as I have done nothing wrong! I am, as he has noted, a paid up member of the site and have only recently got back into chess after a 12 year "absence" from the game and consider myself very much a novice ...[text shortened]... So why dont you crawl back under the stone you came from and stop jumping to conclusions!.....π
Being a paid up member of the site, does not excuse this sort of behaviour.
-Dave
Originally posted by TosserIt's not the deliberate losing that I don't understand, but the resignations.
Normally I wouldnt waste my energy, but sometimes you just have to fight back! I couldnt really give monkey's wot redlentils thinks of me or my "morals" as I have done nothing wrong! I am, as he has noted, a paid up member of the site and have only recently got back into chess after a 12 year "absence" from the game and consider myself very much a novice ...[text shortened]... So why dont you crawl back under the stone you came from and stop jumping to conclusions!.....π
Three games in a row against Tosspot went like this (with you on white, Tosspot on Black)
1. d4 d5 2. c3 Nf6 3. Qa4+??? and then resignation. Qa4 is an awful move in this position - Qd7, Nbd7, Nfd7, Bc7 and c6 all easily refute it. But you expect us to believe that in a span of approximately 30 minutes (i checked the times) the same person resigned in the same position when you made the same bad move each time in three different games?
There's no shame in not being a grandmaster - it's OK to still be learning how to play. What people don't like is artificially increasing your rating by doing this sort of thing. If you really want to learn how to play (and since you paid your money, I assume you do) just ask people and they will try and help you out. That's what the site is for.
-mike
Better yet, go back a few more games and you'll see him beat Tosspot in 1 move!!
http://www.timeforchess.com/core/viewhistory.php?gameid=239235
Here is one as an example. If you think you've done nothing wrong you're really screwed up in the head. Do you really expect people to believe that you won 4-5 games in 1 move vs. the same opponent and it's a legitimate win?????
Get a life! π
Originally posted by legionnaireEr! Thats the whole point of wot im saying! Tosspot73 is jacksh1t to do with me! I dont really care if you believe me or not!.
It's not the deliberate losing that I don't understand, but the resignations.
Three games in a row against Tosspot went like this (with you on white, Tosspot on Black)
1. d4 d5 2. c3 Nf6 3. Qa4+??? and then resignation. Qa4 is an awful move in this position - Qd7, Nbd7, Nfd7, Bc7 and c6 all easily refute it. But you expect us to believe that i ...[text shortened]... do) just ask people and they will try and help you out. That's what the site is for.
-mike
Originally posted by TosserThe fact is I don't believe you. Tosspot73 may or may not have to have ******** to do with you, but you deliberately played these silly games that many times with him. If not, you are even worse off than I thought. I strongly recommend you to start caring about things, including people and communities.
Er! Thats the whole point of wot im saying! Tosspot73 is jacksh1t to do with me! I dont really care if you believe me or not!.
Originally posted by Mephisto2I must of missed the rule that said you cant play the same person twice, so ill have to let Bimbo know (Not that its any of your business, but I happen to work with Bimbo, so my games against her must be rigged too). As I said before, Im not in it for the ratings, so I have no need to artifically inflate them You go on about getting a life, then why dont you get on with yours and stay the fcuk out of mine!
The fact is I don't believe you. Tosspot73 may or may not have to have ******** to do with you, but you deliberately played these silly games that many times with him. If not, you are even worse off than I thought. I strongly recommend you to start caring about things, including people and communities.