19 Jul 03
Originally posted by TosserOK: I'll 'explain': Bin Laddish is a friend of mine, whom i often play and almost almost beat. While i'm by no means a hot-shot player, Bin laddish is worse if i'm brutally honest. Regardless, we enjoy the games, and that is the aim of playing after all.
😴 As your all so keen to stand in moral judgement about others that you know nothing about, try explaning why "Toe" has played "Bin Laddish" no less than 40 times with 39 win, 1 loss record then!😠
As it happens, since bin laddish started playing on this site, he has been getting steadily better, which is good for everyone: so much so he's planning on joining a chess club in his home town, so a big gold star for RHP there!
As for me, i've never refused a challenge yet: though i'd make an exception for you Tosser. Nice name by the way: "by his name shall you know him"...
19 Jul 03
Originally posted by bbarrWhat about drawing your father when you are a piece and two pawns in front, just because it's fatherday?:-P
Then why would ICTWizz deliberately throw a series of rated games to boost his son's rating. Either they are the same person, or Cymro had access to ICTWizz's account. Whatever the explanation, the majority of their games were fake, and that makes Cymro a cheat, just like tosser, ThreeFigs, etc. I don't know what possesses these people, but this behavior shouldn't be rewarded. Players here should boycott the two of them, I know I will.
Olav
19 Jul 03
While on the subject of the 'good book', I think I'll do the Samuel L. Jackson thang...Ezekiel, Chapter 25, verse 17:
"And I will execute [b]great vengeance[i/] upon them with furious rebukes; and they shall know that my name is the Lord when I lay my vengeance upon them."
Tosser, if you are not a vile fig, I challenge you to prove it. Send me a game and I shall...well...lay my vengeance upon you....
20 Jul 03
Let me just say that the two previous posts have left me truly humbled. Two freethinkers have dared to venture into territories that before would be a shaming experience. Yea, verily, they have quoted from the book of old. True heresy for any freethinker. But you are proving to be freethinkers free to explore all even if it is to "know thy enemy" as Master Rob is fond of saying. 🙂
20 Jul 03
Evidently, Kirk, you never saw "Pulp Fiction". Pretty miserable movie if you ask me, except when Ezekiel 25:17 is recited to some hapless underling before he is shot repeatedly. High drama, what? Anyway, I'd like to play Tosser, handily lay my vengeance down, expose him as a cheater, and get my rating slightly more in the realm normally inhabited by poultry.
20 Jul 03
Originally posted by royalchickenIf tosser the cheat accepts your challenge, and you win, then won't you be partaking in his fraud? After all, you'll be receiving points he had no business possessing. Better to boycott them and their clans, I think.
Evidently, Kirk, you never saw "Pulp Fiction". Pretty miserable movie if you ask me, except when Ezekiel 25:17 is recited to some hapless underling before he is shot repeatedly. High drama, what? Anyway, I'd like to play Tosser, handily lay my vengeance down, expose him as a cheater, and get my rating slightly more in the realm normally inhabited by poultry.
20 Jul 03
Originally posted by PhlabibitSo my friend, if someone falsely accused you of something, would you not attempt to defend yourself? By mentioning other people, I am simply highlighting the fact if you look closely, there numerous "suspicious" results out there even if genuine! The law in my country is that your innocent until proved guilty in a court of law (And the accusers aint proved didly squat!) As for Bbar, I just pity the poor sod who ends in the dock if he/she ever has to do Jury service! Not that I give a sh1t wot the kangeroo court in here think, but over the weekend I found out that Tosspot73 is an office joker that I happen to work with and she doent take anything in life seriously! As ive said before, I havnt cheated and have nothing to be ashamed of!!😴
Your name was mentioned a couple times in this thread... now every time someone mentions a cheater you defend your name... sounds like you are cheating since you are going so far to defend your name.
Say you don't cheat... say it. I'll believe you.
You sound worse since you keep pointing fingers at others rather than saying how it turned out people think you cheat. What happened??????
Cheaters stink.... do you?
20 Jul 03
1 edit
Originally posted by TosserI played Ictwizz.
Yeah right! Wotever!!!
I play to win.I make honest mistakes.I thought I was winning 2 nil.
If you look at our games you will see 20 moves of book.
I got 1/2 from two. I can see mistakes I can not see engines he used.
We must move on from our mistakes;life is too short.
Sue.
20 Jul 03
1 edit
Originally posted by bbarrTrue, however, if I trounce him really mercilessly it will offer evidence that he does not deserve to have a 32-10 record. I will be taking advantage of the fraud, however, the fact that one is a cheater does not mean he cannot play chess. A rating is ONLY a parameter for determining the statistical likelihood, based on his recent performance, that player A will beat player B. Nothing more. So while his rating does not necessarily represent his chess skill, I would argue that a rating on RHP very rarely does, because of the fluctuation. For example, consider a game between Mephisto2 and myself. I was rated about 1400 at the time and he about 1210. So based on ratings the probability of my victory was around 75%. However, I clearly didn't beat him (and the chances of my victory were certainly not 3 in 4). I don't know what number represents my actual chess skill, but 1210 does not represent his. Just because Tosser's rating is artificially inflated doesn't mean he is incapable or undeserving of a good game of chess. Besides, I am pining for the days when my win/loss ration exceeded 3.
If tosser the cheat accepts your challenge, and you win, then won't you be partaking in his fraud? After all, you'll be receiving points he had no business possessing.
20 Jul 03
Originally posted by royalchickenAs I said.I play to win.I am human.I make mistakes.When Zack comes back,he takes my Queen.It will cost me points.I have to deal with that because I am human and want to move on.
True, however, if I trounce him really mercilessly it will offer evidence that he does not deserve to have a 32-10 record. I will be taking advantage of the fraud, however, the fact that one is a cheater does not mean he cannot play chess. A rating is ONLY a parameter for determining the statistical likelihood, based on his recent performance, that pl ...[text shortened]... of a good game of chess. Besides, I am pining for the days when my win/loss ration exceeded 3.
Sue.
(we all make mistakes)
20 Jul 03
Originally posted by royalchickenSo why don't you just play him an unrated game?
True, however, if I trounce him really mercilessly it will offer evidence that he does not deserve to have a 32-10 record. I will be taking advantage of the fraud, however, the fact that one is a cheater does not mean he cannot play chess. A rating is ONLY a parameter for determining the statistical likelihood, based on his recent performance, that pl ...[text shortened]... of a good game of chess. Besides, I am pining for the days when my win/loss ration exceeded 3.