02 Feb 08
Originally posted by RamnedI think you may want to look up what an oligarchy is.
What's with these threads condemning the rulings of the field? This is an oligarchy not democracy. There is a code set out, of which was broken. Leave it at that.
I'd refer to RHP as a benevolent dictatorship.
D
02 Feb 08
Originally posted by RamnedHow do you know that the OP is telling the truth? Who says everyone is condemning the ruling of the field? Did you actually read the whole thread or you opened your mouth/keyboard?
What's with these threads condemning the rulings of the field? This is an oligarchy not democracy. There is a code set out, of which was broken. Leave it at that.
02 Feb 08
Originally posted by ludzSpamming like Joepesci did is more annoying, because harder to ignore.
So that he can post insults every day like joepesci. Regulars might leave the forum/site altogether. You and mephisto appear to be joined at the hip.
ps. Where/if/how lioness and me are joined is none of your business.
02 Feb 08
1 edit
Originally posted by ludzThe fact that this thread exists represents a questioning of why he was banned, so I used my common sense to figure it out rather than read.
How do you know that the OP is telling the truth? Who says everyone is condemning the ruling of the field? Did you actually read the whole thread or you opened your mouth/keyboard?
What is "OP"
02 Feb 08
Originally posted by RamnedOP is original poster.
The fact that this thread exists represents a questioning of why he was banned, so I used my common sense to figure it out rather than read.
What is "OP"
It amazes me that someone who joined the site not 2 weeks ago is starting such threads, and judging an online person as "ok" with little substance to back that up.
02 Feb 08
Originally posted by Alexander AlekhineThere was a very short (25 seconds) appeals hearing about the ban heard by High Justice Whacker.
So...the guy gets a 2 and a half year ban from posting anything....in the forums and even the private forums.
2010!! is that reasonable?
after all....he was an ok guy.
Taking everthing into consideration, the appeal judge has upheld the ban but decided to extend it to 4 years. 😲
When questioned about his decision later High Justice Whacker said I was about to go for a game of golf when I was told about this case. It is most annoying to have ones day spoilt so I decided to do likewise to the appelant. He was luck I was in a good mood and won my game. Had I lost I would have added a further year
Just goes to show that appealing does not do any good. 😛
02 Feb 08
Originally posted by RamnedHow do you know chessisvanity has been banned? All on the word of Alexander Alekhine? What connection do Alexander Alekhine and chessisvanity have?
The fact that this thread exists represents a questioning of why he was banned, so I used my common sense to figure it out rather than read.
What is "OP"
People have stated that chessisvanity regularly posted a lot of vulgar information that probably broke the site rules. Alexander Alekhine has stated that chessisvanity is a good guy obviously contradicting these guys.
You are then stating what you think on Alexander Alekhine's word, is that logical?