Originally posted by rbmorrisSeems to me you'd show a paying member a little more respect than to just
Then again, you never know if (during the ban) the person sent insulting PMs, rude in-game messages or if other offensive posts were discovered.
prolong a ban without stating a clear cause as to why.
Originally posted by stockenI agree. They should be paid that courtesy, at least. But then again, this place has never been consistent with its moderation so who's to think it will start now.
Seems to me you'd show a paying member a little more respect than to just
prolong a ban without stating a clear cause as to why.
Originally posted by SJ247You're assuming that bannable posts are always found in chronological order. What if I said something mildly bannable, but had previously posted your home address? Maybe the mildly bannable post was found first, but then the really bad one was found (or reported) afterward? That to me, would warrant an extension.
"Offensive posts discovered"? Ha Ha Ha! How many bans would we all be subject to if mods practice banning us for old posts...and, how many bans could be issued for each past post on record?
Originally posted by rbmorrisA good point, but I don't think it is the case here. I was told the moderator told the banned person that the original ban was too lenient, so tacked on more days.
You're assuming that bannable posts are always found in chronological order. What if I said something mildly bannable, but had previously posted your home address? Maybe the mildly bannable post was found first, but then the really bad one was found (or reported) afterward? That to me, would warrant an extension.
Originally posted by rbmorrisApparently he was presented with a cause. The original punishment was too
Who ever said the banned person wouldn't be informed?
lenient. Ha! What a joke. Whatever imbecille moderator prolonged that ban
need to take a good look at him/herself and ask: "Am I really appropriate
for this role, or should I stuff my butt with bananas and go bliss, leave
thinking to more qualified people?"