@great-big-stees saidThe mentioning of Hitler has happened in public over and over and over again. Why would discussion of it need to be in private?
Perhaps PM them and ask directly? Unless you are on their “naughty” list.🤔
- Joined
- 14 Mar 04
- Moves
- 186286
@fmf saidPrivate conversation can be done in private and need not be aired in the forums. We don’t need to hear about yours, and other’s, issues with certain members.
The mentioning of Hitler has happened in public over and over and over again. Why would discussion of it need to be in private?
@great-big-stees saidWhat did duchess64, Suzianne and Ghost of a Duke think of your suggestion when you addressed them publicly airing their “issues with certain members”?
Private conversation can be done in private and need not be aired in the forums. We don’t need to hear about yours, and other’s, issues with certain members.
@great-big-stees saidSpeak for yourself. As I said, the mentioning of Hitler has happened in public over and over and over again. It didn't happen in "private conversation". If you are not interested in "Godwin's Law" as it plays itself out on this public forum, perhaps this thread is just not for you.
Private conversation can be done in private and need not be aired in the forums. We don’t need to hear about yours, and other’s, issues with certain members.
15 Jul 21
@great-big-stees saidIf what you are suggesting is that Duchess64 makes her Hitler comparisons in PMs to me rather than in public, why don't you confront her about it, instead of me?
Private conversation can be done in private and need not be aired in the forums. We don’t need to hear about yours, and other’s, issues with certain members.
@divegeester said4 thumbs down but no reply.
What did duchess64, Suzianne and Ghost of a Duke think of your suggestion when you addressed them publicly airing their “issues with certain members”?
True to form.
