11 Jan 07
Originally posted by EcstremeVenomNot true. There are many homeless families. In the United States, many families are two paychecks or one fire away from being homeless.
well if theyre homeless they dont have parents. i also heard that 80-90* of prisoners have something wrong with the part of their brain that tells the difference between right and wrong which is caused by the mom consuming alcohol while carrying the baby. so who do you think deserves to be in jail, i say the parents should take responsibility. (although the kids have to be in prison also cuz they are dangerous if not)
11 Jan 07
Originally posted by EcstremeVenomBecause we evolved that way, if people cared for other peoples children then there own there genes wouldn't be passed on and the selfish sponges who take all the effort from kind people would prosper.
why be so selfish?
Simple Science. That is why. We don't have to follow it but that is the evolutionary basis for what you have asked. Doesn't mean I advocate it.
11 Jan 07
Originally posted by EcstremeVenomIf you can't then yes, offer the service of a stable life, away from the abusive, if that is what the child has experienced. But if the so called homeless child is making itself homeless for unestablished reasons, then be careful. But, yes, I think try! If you can't have your own.
why be so selfish? a philosopher that i forgot the name, said that we are all guilty of the GOOD that we did NOT do. should you adopt kids instead of having your own?
