04 Jan 04
Does anyone out there believe that George Bush is capable of stringing a coherent sentance together without the aid of a scriptwriter (surely a prerequisite for the leader of the free world!). What an indictment of the US
system that they can't find a decent President out of a population of over 200 million people. Land of opportunity? Yes it is if you have millions of dollars and the backing of large multinationals. Democracy? Don't make me laugh!!
04 Jan 04
Originally posted by ianpickeringI didn't think it was possible to have a worse president than Reagan. But now Bush comes along and makes me realize that the Republicans are capable of stooping to depths of evil that I had not believed were humanly possible. It absolutley boggles the mind to think that for all the toxic levels of concentrated evil that seep from his every pore, there is still an endless reservoir within him waiting to be unleashed upon an unsuspecting world.
Does anyone out there believe that George Bush is capable of stringing a coherent sentance together without the aid of a scriptwriter (surely a prerequisite for the leader of the free world!). What an indictment of the US
system that they can't find a decent President out of a population of over 200 million people. Land of opportunity? Yes it is if ...[text shortened]... millions of dollars and the backing of large multinationals. Democracy? Don't make me laugh!!
04 Jan 04
Originally posted by ianpickeringNay, ianpickering, you are mistaken. Tragically mistaken. George W. Bush is the very embodiment of evil. A vile, corrosive, malignant evil the likes of which have never been equaled in the annals of history. He embodies an evil so expansive, so all encompassing, so absolutely black at its very core, that it is almost defies comprehension. The fact that he is largely able to pass himself off as being merely an incompetant, bumbling fool only adds to the very horror of the situation. It would be folly to underestimate his capacity for unleashing even greater plagues and destruction upon humanity.
I think the word "evil" is a bit strong. I think 'misguided' and 'intellectually challenged' would be nearer the mark.
04 Jan 04
Originally posted by rwingettI can see why someone from overseas would not understand the complexities of the US goverment, but you my friend are either an obvious digrunted democrate who must enjoy paying the goverment 40% + taxes, or maybe one who sits back and enjoys the many freebees the democrates have installed in our goverment.
I didn't think it was possible to have a worse president than Reagan. But now Bush comes along and makes me realize that the Republicans are capable of stooping to depths of evil that I had not believed were humanly possible. It absolutley boggles the mind to think that for all the toxic levels of concentrated evil that seep from his every pore, there is still an endless reservoir within him waiting to be unleashed upon an unsuspecting world.
04 Jan 04
Originally posted by rwingettAnd Free Willy Clinton wasn't an embarrisment to the US presidency?
Nay, ianpickering, you are mistaken. Tragically mistaken. George W. Bush is the very embodiment of evil. A vile, corrosive, malignant evil the likes of which have never been equaled in the annals of history. He embodies an evil so expansive, so all encompassing, so absolutely black at its very core, that it is almost defies comprehension. The fact that he i ...[text shortened]... o underestimate his capacity for unleashing even greater plagues and destruction upon humanity.
04 Jan 04
Originally posted by WildekoyoteNo, my friend, I am not a "digrunted democrate", I am a "disgruntled Democrat".
I can see why someone from overseas would not understand the complexities of the US goverment, but you my friend are either an obvious digrunted democrate who must enjoy paying the goverment 40% + taxes, or maybe one who sits back and enjoys the many freebees the democrates have installed in our goverment.
04 Jan 04
Originally posted by WildekoyoteActually, for all the jokes about him, we rather liked Clinton over here. Only last year he got about a hundred standing ovasions at the Labour party conference. So you see, it's not an automatic anti-American thing my any means, just a very strong feeling that Bush is either an arch-prat or something much worse.
And Free Willy Clinton wasn't an embarrisment to the US presidency?
Rich.
04 Jan 04
Originally posted by ianpickeringAnd Tony Blair is a genius? I agree that Bush may not be eloquently gifted as the "snake" slick Willy Clinton was, but I doubt that George will leave jism stains on someone's dress other than his wife's and not concentrate on foreign policy due to his covering up his shennanigans like a cat covering up crap. I agree that we have a limited supply of talent running for the presidency, especially with the Democrats, but GW is what we have now so we have to live with that fact. Do you have someone else in mind? Please let me know....🙄
Does anyone out there believe that George Bush is capable of stringing a coherent sentance together without the aid of a scriptwriter (surely a prerequisite for the leader of the free world!). What an indictment of the US
system that they can't find a decent President out of a population of over 200 million people. Land of opportunity? Yes it is if ...[text shortened]... millions of dollars and the backing of large multinationals. Democracy? Don't make me laugh!!
04 Jan 04
Originally posted by rwingettthe position of us president existed long before bush came along, knowing a bumbling fool was required to fill the spot, why not just choose a genuine one?
George W. Bush is the very embodiment of evil. A vile, corrosive, malignant evil the likes of which have never been equaled in the annals of history. The fact that he is largely able to pass himself off as being merely an incompetant, bumbling fool only adds to the very horror of the situation. It would be folly to underestimate his capacity for unleashing even greater plagues and destruction upon humanity.
i suspect he actually thinks he is a good person 🙄
04 Jan 04
Originally posted by rwingettSince you think GW is "evil", I guess Saddam Hussein emits warm fuzzies, no? Hitler was less evil than Bush? It seems your ability to judge a President's morals or distinguish between good and bad leaders/dictators is warped. That is just typical of socialistic Democrats who want to just turn their backs and wish true "evil" just disappears....which it won't...go figure....🙄
Nay, ianpickering, you are mistaken. Tragically mistaken. George W. Bush is the very embodiment of evil. A vile, corrosive, malignant evil the likes of which have never been equaled in the annals of history. He embodies an evil so expansive, so all encompassing, so absolutely black at its very core, that it is almost defies comprehension. The fact that he i ...[text shortened]... o underestimate his capacity for unleashing even greater plagues and destruction upon humanity.