General
18 Dec 20
20 Dec 20
@blood-on-the-tracks saidCall it anything you want.
@FMF
Yep, erm, ok.
Neither is your post.
Shall! We call it a draw?
20 Dec 20
@fmf saidI think petewxyz may be alerting our posts because he now wants to be called “relentless Red”.
The issue for petewxyz seems to be that Joker "sets back health education." He said he'd "even encountered professionals working in education who need support understanding that a psychosis label doesn't mean they have to treat their student as potentially violent." His personal anecdote about watching the film with someone who was mentally ill is not very interesting.
- Joined
- 11 Nov 14
- Moves
- 34223
@divegeester saidMight be just 'cause he's a scouser.
I think petewxyz may be alerting our posts because he now wants to be called “relentless Red”.
Don't trust them!
20 Dec 20
@relentless-red saidDo you really believe the film Joker has misled "professionals working in education"?
I've even encountered professionals working in education who need support understanding that a psychosis label doesn't mean they have to treat their student as potentially violent.
When working with people who are suffering psychosis, when should the consideration of potential violence be factored in and what bearing does the plot of Joker have on this?
@blood-on-the-tracks saidHi BOTT. That is really generous of you to throw some self disclosure into the mix. You are also very intuitive as you are way closer to the truth than any of the wild guesses thrown at me by the tag team. You are also completely right that I never mentioned my past employment and I suspect that I would hold the same views and values regardless of my past employment. In fact they probably resulted in my choice of career so it made me laugh reading Cheesemaster stating adamantly that I would be a person who took no action to back up their values.
@FMF
Here is something to throw out there.
If you have a relative with a mental illness, you find this film slightly awkward. You obviously know more about this Liverpool fan than me, so possibly professionally he had reasons to highlight this.
Many years ago, Ronnie Barker had a show on tv called 'Open All Hours'. a 'highlight' of said show was Mr Bark ...[text shortened]... hilariously mocking a stammer. My son stammered, I hated the program.
There is a slight analogy?
So for the record.
I simply expressed a view about a movie and then a genre of movies that was consistent with my views and values that are held due to personal experience (the kind of stuff Dive states that you simply don't troll people about).
Anybody who knew me would not recognise me from the wild assertions of the tag team.
FMF is a troll who just jumped on this because he bears a grudge that I have said his sealioning reveals a lack of ethics.
I have not alerted any of the tag team's posts in this thread despite Dive's growing preoccupation with this theme. Dive will also remember that he was shocked when he discovered my past employment as I had virtually never mentioned it making a nonsense of his claim that I am preoccupied with it. He only found out the detail via a PM.
Oh and FMF, of course I won't be answering your questions as they are again sealioning as illustrated by the way BOTT could quickly and accurately grasp what was going on without the need for them. Shame he doesn't trust Scousers, but nobody is perfect.
Fin.
@relentless-red saidNo. You are mistaken. They are genuine questions about the film Joker based on what you said about it.
Oh and FMF, of course I won't be answering your questions as they are again sealioning
@relentless-red saidHuh? You mentioned it over and over and over and over again, specifically and explicitly, on the Spirituality Forum throughout 2020 and most recently on the topic of cult member parents not protecting their children .
Dive will also remember that he was shocked when he discovered my past employment as I had virtually never mentioned it making a nonsense of his claim that I am preoccupied with it.
20 Dec 20
@relentless-red saidDo you think psychosis should NEVER be portrayed as being linked to violence and criminality?
I simply expressed a view about a movie and then a genre of movies that was consistent with my views and values that are held due to personal experience
20 Dec 20
@relentless-red saidWhy do you think there are posts that are being alerted?
I have not alerted any of the tag team's posts in this thread
20 Dec 20
@relentless-red saidAs I said earlier, I think FMF has you and your motives in this thread, very well pegged.
FMF is a troll who just jumped on this because he bears a grudge that I have said his sealioning reveals a lack of ethics.
@fmf saidThe pattern is the same with Ghost of a Duck who, when is feathers are ruffled, will deny the alerting of posts by his detractors. It is of course possible that the core team of the Ghost Chamber club or Misfits clan simply alert those posts which are directed at one of their tag-team (sic) buddies.
Why do you think there are posts that are being alerted?
@divegeester saidIf you want me to put a second alert on one of your posts I will even do that and make reference to this post as explanation.
The pattern is the same with Ghost of a Duck who, when is feathers are ruffled, will deny the alerting of posts by his detractors. It is of course possible that the core team of the Ghost Chamber club simply alert those posts which are directed at one of their tag-team (sic) buddies.
Don't go any further down this road as you will embarrass yourself. My views and values are for deep seated and personal reasons that I have no intention of disclosing in a public forum. They are not fake as you suggest and in fact they were known to one or two people on this site long before this thread. They were not manufactured for whatever wild fantasy you or FMF care to dream up when somebody expresses a view that you do not like. Take a breath and let it go.
20 Dec 20
@relentless-red saidAs I’ve said, several times already, I think FMF has you well pegged earlier in this thread.
My views and values are for deep seated and personal reasons that I have no intention of disclosing in a public forum. They are not fake as you suggest and in fact they were known to one or two people on this site long before this thread. They were not manufactured for whatever wild fantasy you or FMF care to dream up when somebody expresses a view that you do not like.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29602
@divegeester saidIt's perhaps apt, in a thread about mental health, that you are exhibiting bizarre paranoia.
The pattern is the same with Ghost of a Duck who, when is feathers are ruffled, will deny the alerting of posts by his detractors. It is of course possible that the core team of the Ghost Chamber club or Misfits clan simply alert those posts which are directed at one of their tag-team (sic) buddies.
Get a grip mate.