Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveWhile I don't agree with the stuff they are putting forward (eg the US firing a missile at the Pentagon) I do (and did at the time) find it odd that the two buildings would collapse as they did.
What is it - another conspiracy theory? lol. 🙄
Just looked it up and sure enough it's more nutcases with their ridiculous theories. Very amusing though haha.
The 2nd tower (one that collapsed first) fell at a speed that suggested there was hardly any resistance to it. Even if the fire caused by the plane melted the steel structure in the upper floors, why would the lower ones collapse like they did?
Not saying it's a conspiracy theory or something, but it doesn't quite add up for me.
Originally posted by CritaConsult a civil engineer about how much rapidly descending weight would be needed to cause this effect. If you would rather cling to conspiracy fantasies, check with the Dooooonman. He's on the Mother Ship.
While I don't agree with the stuff they are putting forward (eg the US firing a missile at the Pentagon) I do (and did at the time) find it odd that the two buildings would collapse as they did.
The 2nd tower (one that collapsed first) fell at a speed that suggested there was hardly any resistance to it. Even if the fire caused by the plane melted the steel ...[text shortened]... did?
Not saying it's a conspiracy theory or something, but it doesn't quite add up for me.
You guys are just amazing!
😕
Jeb
Originally posted by jebrydzaginUnfortunately, I don't know any civil engineers.......they're all rude! ha ha ha. Sorry, bad joke.
Consult a civil engineer about how much rapidly descending weight would be needed to cause this effect. If you would rather cling to conspiracy fantasies, check with the Dooooonman. He's on the Mother Ship.
You guys are just amazing!
😕
Jeb
But seriously, are you saying that it's possible it was just the fire from the plane that caused the collapse? I'm not an engineer, so it was merely a notion of mine that there should have been some resistance from the steel supports.
Like I said before, I don't buy into the conspiracy stuff, but I don't think it's as clear cut as the government says.
Originally posted by CritaDon't let the right-wing influence your thinking. It's very obvious to anyone who watches the movie that the towers collapsed from explosive charges set inside them.
Unfortunately, I don't know any civil engineers.......they're all rude! ha ha ha. Sorry, bad joke.
But seriously, are you saying that it's possible it was just the fire from the plane that caused the collapse? I'm not an engineer, so it was merely a notion of mine that there should have been some resistance from the steel supports.
Like I said before, I uy into the conspiracy stuff, but I don't think it's as clear cut as the government says.
I think Jeb might actually be on Bush's payroll... cause nobody could be that naive.
911 was all planned way in advance by the right wing to take away your civil liberties. Just look at what the Bush administration has done so far - and they are pushing for more! Much more!
Originally posted by ArrakisNo offence bro, but i watched the scenes live and i never saw anything to make me believe there was foul play by the home team.
Don't let the right-wing influence your thinking. It's very obvious to anyone who watches the movie that the towers collapsed from explosive charges set inside them.
I think Jeb might actually be on Bush's payroll... cause nobody could be that naive.
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundWhat about the firemen who, on live TV, said that they heard explosions one right after the other as the building collapsed? They heard the explosions before the floors started falling.
No offence bro, but i watched the scenes live and i never saw anything to make me believe there was foul play by the home team.