Most Loved:Most Hated@RHP

Originally posted by SJ247
Is there a reason you're accusing me of something? It is actually irritating me.

Have you taken notice, by chance, at my number of games? Is it not obvious to you that I am actually here, primarily, to play chess?

Is there something wrong with having some fun in forums? Or is it only acceptable to bash people and talk politics.

I dish out what I ge ...[text shortened]... too.

I am no more rude than the next person, and usually not until it's thrown my way.

Would you like me to pick your toys up??😛

Originally posted by Nordlys
It's in my nature to see. A blind person can't see. We are both humans. Did the blind person decide not to see?

Now that we talk about this, I think we had a similar discussion about homosexuality before, hadn't we?

You were born without it?... mmmhhh...

Regarding homosexuality I don't recall quite well. I think I discussed that topic but with Rosa K.

Originally posted by RookRAK
SJ - I'm just kidding. I'm not really accusing you of anything.

Besides, the people I was really trying to tease were your fans.

Sorry everyone - I'm leaving now - resume what you were doing ....

Accepted.

No resuming, I've lost my appetite.

Maybe later.

Originally posted by SJ247
Is there a reason you're accusing me of something? It is actually irritating me.

Have you taken notice, by chance, at my number of games? Is it not obvious to you that I am actually here, primarily, to play chess?

Is there something wrong with having some fun in forums? Or is it only acceptable to bash people and talk politics.

I dish out what I ge ...[text shortened]... too.

I am no more rude than the next person, and usually not until it's thrown my way.

You enjoy talking about sex in a public forum with 13 year olds?

Most adult women probably wouldn't do that, so I guess that's why he doesn't truly believe that your online persona is really who you say it is.

D

Originally posted by Ragnorak
You enjoy talking about sex in a public forum with 13 year olds?

Most adult women probably wouldn't do that, so I guess that's why he doesn't truly believe that your online persona is really who you say it is.

D

Who is 13?

Originally posted by SJ247
Who is 13?

The minimum age for the site is 13. There are many 13 year olds here.

D

Originally posted by Ragnorak
The minimum age for the site is 13. There are many 13 year olds here.

D

and I thought all the posts have been perfectly harmless.

Originally posted by Aiko
......By the way, people I think are jerk(ette)s: The Slow Pawn, Skeeter.......

Charming......😕

Originally posted by rmacken
and I thought all the posts have been perfectly harmless.

They don't bother me. My point was that most women wouldn't tell hordes of random strangers, including children of 13 about how often they masturbate at work. So RookRak had a point in saying that SJ may be a man.

D

Originally posted by Ragnorak
They don't bother me. My point was that most women wouldn't tell hordes of random strangers, including children of 13 about how often they masturbate at work. So RookRak had a point in saying that SJ may be a man.

D

Although what you say is true, I have read many more unsuitable posts in the past for 13 year olds to read than what SJ has posted tonight.

Plus, it was around 13 y/o when I started learning the birds and the bees and given the choice I would rather read what has been posted in this thread than in a seedy chatroom if I were 13.

Originally posted by Ragnorak
They don't bother me. My point was that most women wouldn't tell hordes of random strangers, including children of 13 about how often they masturbate at work. So RookRak had a point in saying that SJ may be a man.

D

Okay, I see.
One must post in forums only material with subject focused on chess, photography, war/politics, racism, religion, and douches.

I literally have a headache now that I've read some of yours. The juiciest material you've posted was a story about a guy giving it to a goat. Totally kid-friendly.

I did not talk about frequency by the way. And, if you were reading, it was in response to a post. You know, in my little review of your posts, I didn't happen to see any that scorned men for posting perverse things. Why I wonder.

Originally posted by SJ247
Okay, I see.
One must post in forums only material with subject focused on chess, photography, war/politics, racism, religion, and douches.

I literally have a headache now that I've read some of yours. The juiciest material you've posted was a story about a guy giving it to a goat. Totally kid-friendly.

I did not talk about frequency by the way. An ...[text shortened]... osts, I didn't happen to see any that scorned men for posting perverse things. Why I wonder.

As I said (twice), I don't have a problem with what you posted. But if I were to do a profile on typical behaviour in public forums, if somebody said they were female, and posted a pic of "themselves", and then proceeded to talk about sex in the majority of their posts, I'd guess that the person was a guy. That was my point, which was in reference to your post directed at RookRak, who obviously thinks the same as I do.

Re the goat thing... would you prefer children to read that Muslims are crazy and that they force people to marry goats, or the true story which was that a guy shagged a goat, and the owner caught him and said "You treated my goat like your wife, now you have to buy it, and pay me a "dowry".

Re me scorning men, I'll repeat again, especially for you, that I don't generally have a problem with people posting whatever they want. Why don't you get off your feminist high-horse, and bake a cake or something. I hear its very therapeutic.

D

Originally posted by Ragnorak
They don't bother me. My point was that most women wouldn't tell hordes of random strangers, including children of 13 about how often they masturbate at work. So RookRak had a point in saying that SJ may be a man.

D

Oh my God, how did I overlook this point...

"Most" women wouldn't do this or that? So it's a safe assumption I am a man? How stupid is that?

Who cares what "most" women would do? That is something I actually take pride in, not following the "norm", and saying what I'd like, as often as possible.

I love it when a person ridicules another for speaking their mind. Or when someone just cannot bear the thought that there may be women in the world that speaks openly about sexual matters.

You strike me as someone who might, (keyword="might"😉 have partaken in witch burnings years ago.

Re me scorning men, I'll repeat again, especially for you, that I don't generally have a problem with people posting whatever they want. Why don't you get off your feminist high-horse, and bake a cake or something. I hear its very therapeutic.

D[/b]

Generally, but in THIS case you felt the need to spout up.

I am actually not a feminist. Men are great. I am just not as subservient as many men would like to have me be.

Baking a cake is therapeutic, yes, so is watching fish, talking about sex, and masturbation.

Originally posted by SJ247
Baking a cake is therapeutic, yes, so is watching fish, talking about sex, and masturbation.

you also get a good nights sleep after it!

Why is that?? and dont say coz your shagged!!