General
30 Nov 09
30 Nov 09
Originally posted by PhlabibitPFC?...Please show me that clan.
Isn't a more important question right now "Are there any new clans as influential as the PFC"?
Either way, the answer is NO.
P-
The more important question was the topic of the thread, as far as I am concerned.
Everyone knows Metallica is the Best Clan. 😏
30 Nov 09
Originally posted by Very RustyMetal Licker? I've not seen there name pop up in umpteen threads in the past week.
PFC?...Please show me that clan.
The more important question was the topic of the thread, as far as I am concerned.
Everyone knows Metallica is the Best Clan. 😏
About the only time I read that name is when people rightly talk about how lame the clan scoring system is.
Are you a member?
I said, are YOU a member? Yes or no?
P-
30 Nov 09
Originally posted by PhlabibitDo you follow close enough to know Metallica Clan?
Metal Licker? I've not seen there name pop up in umpteen threads in the past week.
About the only time I read that name is when people rightly talk about how lame the clan scoring system is.
Are you a member?
I said, are YOU a member? Yes or no?
P-
The scoring system is the same for all.
The crying you hear are from the ones who can't keep up.
I am a Proud Member of the #1 Metallica Clan! 😏
If you played chess, I would put in a good word for you, being its you. 😉
30 Nov 09
Originally posted by Very RustyPeople were complaining about the system long before you arrived. It rewards quantity over quality. You'd certainly have a different view were you a member of my old clan #9 Chess Lords back in THE DAY.
Do you follow close enough to know Metallica Clan?
The scoring system is the same for all.
The crying you hear are from the ones who can't keep up.
I am a Proud Member of the #1 Metallica Clan! 😏
If you played chess, I would put in a good word for you, being its you. 😉
Imagine having a 90%+ win record only to have bulk clans winning 60% pass you because points were awarded for quantity.
At least Russ tried to straighten that out a bit with clan leagues, but it was a bit too late in my mind, and no one really cares about clan leagues vs regular clan since that's the number that puts you at top.
P-
30 Nov 09
Originally posted by PhlabibitYou are right, I really don't know much about it. I only got here on 2006.
People were complaining about the system long before you arrived. It rewards quantity over quality. You'd certainly have a different view were you a member of my old clan #9 Chess Lords back in THE DAY.
Imagine having a 90%+ win record only to have bulk clans winning 60% pass you because points were awarded for quantity.
At least Russ tried to stra ...[text shortened]... y cares about clan leagues vs regular clan since that's the number that puts you at top.
P-
I just know it is the same for all. I know it has been hashed out over, and over, and over again.
I am not a betting man, although I would be willing to bet the top teams would still be the top teams even with a different scoring system. Then what would the complaining be about?
30 Nov 09
Originally posted by Very RustyThink so?
You are right, I really don't know much about it. I only got here on 2006.
I just know it is the same for all. I know it has been hashed out over, and over, and over again.
I am not a betting man, although I would be willing to bet the top teams would still be the top teams even with a different scoring system. Then what would the complaining be about?
Most clans playing at a high-level of most-all win were replaced by clans using brute force. There was no sense in continuing for clans winning a high percentage since clan system wasn't about quality of play, but became playing more and more an more.
So, yet another assumption of yours is wrong.
P-
