Go back
Non sequitur

Non sequitur

General

Clock

Wikipedia says:
Non sequitur is Latin for "it does not follow." It is most often used as a noun to describe illogical statements. Non sequitur may refer to:
Non sequitur (literary device), an irrelevant, often humorous comment to a preceding topic or statement.
Non sequitur (logic), a logical fallacy where a stated conclusion is not supported by its premise.

This whole forum is a multiplicity of non sequiturs. It's something we're good at. 🙂

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

There are plenty of logical fallicies. Life is full of them as we all try to justify ourselves and fail miserably.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Texan sharp shooter!

Clock

Why do you want to kill sharps? They never did anything to you. 😕

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kewpie
Why do you want to kill sharps? They never did anything to you. 😕
Noooooo. it's a form of logical fallicy in that, you move an argument to fit some facts. the name comes from an example in which someone shoots a load of holes in a wall and then moves the target next to the bullet holes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_sharpshooter_fallacy

Clock

Wikipedia quote: if we pay attention to a cluster of cancer cases in a certain sub-population and then draw our "circle" around the smallest area that includes this cluster, this sample will appear to be suffering an unusually high rate of cancer, but if we included the rest of the population, the incidence would regress to the average.

Sounds like what somebody used in the Debates forum to argue that glaciers are growing - he used a shonky website which only looked at the 2% of glaciers currently growing and excluded the 98% which were shrinking. So in his world 100% of glaciers are growing ....

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Kewpie
Wikipedia quote: if we pay attention to a cluster of cancer cases in a certain sub-population and then draw our "circle" around the smallest area that includes this cluster, this sample will appear to be suffering an unusually high rate of cancer, but if we included the rest of the population, the incidence would regress to the average.

Sounds like what s ...[text shortened]... and excluded the 98% which were shrinking. So in his world 100% of glaciers are growing ....
Take it to the debates spanky!

😏

Clock

They're too serious in there. 🙁

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sicilian Sausage
Take it to the debates spanky!

😏
You already won, your debating logic with Kewpie.

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur

Clock
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Phlabibit
You already won, your debating logic with Kewpie.
Oops, wrong thread... Thought this was ad homonym thread!

Clock

If i take things out of sequence am i in the right forum?

Clock

confusing, isn't it?

Clock

Originally posted by Kewpie
confusing, isn't it?
I'm not sure

it seems logical

Clock

you really must be tired ...

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.