05 Nov 09
Originally posted by BlackampYour posts seem so much more readable and enjoyable when the awkward/clinical strain doesn't show.
um.............................................ok. that's tangential, even by your hyperbolic standards.
EDIT: oh wait - is this one of your 'hidden message for the cognoscenti' things?
Most all of us are hopeful that some of the intellectual intimacy issues you have will eventually resolve.
.................................
05 Nov 09
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby*az nice az i can*
Your posts seem so much more readable and enjoyable when the awkward/clinical strain doesn't show.
Most all of us are hopeful that some of the intellectual intimacy issues you have will eventually resolve.
.................................
you took a poll???
i didn't receive my copy of tha survey...
since you feel obliged to point out others flaws, foibles, and foopahs, i'm gonna point one out fer you...
you really like to think "others" are included in yer crusade to improve "others"...
well, whether or not that's true, i sure ain't...
i LIKE tha jackoffs to be jackoffs...
and tha pristine to be pristine...
tha yin balances tha yang...
i used to think that yer snobbery wuz a cover so yer teachings were "hidden" and therefore must be dug up to be shown in tha light...
i now think of them az leftovers from a downtown restaurant, tossed inna tha dumpster out back, picked thru fer a few morsels by tha homeless...
while tha rest of tha city cruises by without noticing...
what wuz that???
don't know, are we late???
not yet, keep driving...
😞
rookie
05 Nov 09
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby"intellectual intimacy issues" - another Grampyism devoid of content. so, what exactly is an "intellectual intimacy issue", pray tell? please, enlighten us.
Most all of us are hopeful that some of the intellectual intimacy issues you have will eventually resolve.
.................................
and by 'most all of us', do you mean the people in your head?