05 Aug 09
1 edit
Originally posted by Very Rustyi don't think there is a danger of any of these, so long as the criticisms are mainly responsive to the posts they are criticising, or some pattern underlying the posts being criticised, or something like that.
When does it come to a point where it is stalking, instigating, or inciting?
i think the best way to think about this is by analogy. books, films, music etc. are published into the public domain, and thereby become a fair object of criticism. there are people (critics) whose job is to assess these works and make a judgement, which other people can accept or reject. critics don't usually produce their own books, films, music, etc. - though there are exceptions (Godard, Truffaut, etc.).
similarly, when someone posts in a public forum, their posts are fair objects for criticism. critics don't need to start lots of threads - their function is different.
10 Aug 09
1 edit
Originally posted by Very RustyColor blue is blue! Sometime color green looks not like green but something else. Eating pbj and talking aloud at same time while post. Choke on food but gasp real hard to fix. My brain hurt!
I can not see any reason why the poster would want to continue going back to future threads, only to be a critic, and hurl insults. There is absolutely nothing positive to be gained by doing this type of thing, over and over again...I think the good alternative would be to make interesting threads of their own.
Originally posted by Blackamp
ok, i sense we're starting to go around in circles. let's just agree to disagree.
No, throw more psychobabble at him this instant.
12 Aug 09
Originally posted by Anonymousnumber1Thank you.
Color blue is blue! Sometime color green looks not like green but something else. Eating pbj and talking aloud at same time while post. Choke on food but gasp real hard to fix. My brain hurt!
Originally posted by Blackamp
[b]ok, i sense we're starting to go around in circles. let's just agree to disagree.
No, throw more psychobabble at him this instant.[/b]
14 Aug 09
1 edit
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyRecent Archaeological Discovery
"take this current thread. 'who are we?' 'why are we here?' etc. ok, the eternal questions, fair enough -
i have no problem with a discussion on that, per se" [b]Blackamp
(1) Who are we?
Point of view: Second order of creation (angelic, human, food chain).
Your view?[/b]
"Recent reports from an undisclosed dig site document discovery of CWC (Cold Wet Cave), the first General Forum in the history
of mankind. Of particular interest, the findings include an archive photo of the very first thread ever posted by a CWC Member."
.........................
"Things I Wonder About"
(1) Who are we? (2) Why are we here? (3) Where are we going? (4) How
will we get there? (5) Will the sun shine for our 1st Meet-Up in August?
Cromag~
__________________________
(1) Who are we?
Point of View: Second order of creation (angelic, human, food chain).
(2) Why are we here?
Point of View: To resolve the prehistoric angelic conflict.
.......................
(3) Where are we going?
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
14 Aug 09
who are we - we dont know until we know everything.
why are we here - we dont know until we know everything
where are we going - we will never know.
how will we get there - the same way we've got here
will the sun shine - for a while.
there is nothing to resolve, we are here, we are self aware, we dont know anything we can only guess, that is both for angels and for the laws of quantom physics.
we will never know anything.
15 Aug 09
"3) Where are we going?"
Body is mortal. Soul is immortal, goes to one of two addresses at death... with God or separated from God. He respects human volition.
Though it's His permissive rather than express will, He's comfortable honoring an individual's decisions/wishes in time for all eternity.
15 Aug 09
Originally posted by Grampy Bobbyyou're really only here to try to foist your religious views on the innocent, aren't you??
[b]"3) Where are we going?"
Body is mortal. Soul is immortal, goes to one of two addresses at death... with God or separated from God. He respects human volition.
Though it's His permissive rather than express will, He's comfortable honoring an individual's decisions/wishes in time for all eternity.[/b]
17 Aug 09
2 edits
Originally posted by BlackampYou are dead wrong once again. I do not give a good god damn about any "religion". Every last one of them since day one is manmade,
you're really only here to try to foist your religious views on the innocent, aren't you??
horizontal and counterfeit (man by man's efforts trying to appease and gain the approval of God). Christianity = a gift and a relationship.