Here's a suggestion. Why not have moderators destroy anything that does not make some attempt at being readable grammatically? Of course, much of the best stuff in here comes from people whose first language is not English, and of course that should not be penalized (to do so would be narrow-minded and evil). However, when someone substitues "u" for "you" or "ur" for "you are", or uses AIM-speak, why not moderate it out of hand? The result would be that anyone who wanted their posts heard would be forced to devote some time to writing them. Also, I believe that the 'post count' should be done away with.
Originally posted by royalchickenI was thinking...
Here's a suggestion. Why not have moderators destroy anything that does not make some attempt at being readable grammatically? Of course, much of the best stuff in here comes from people whose first language is not English, and of course that should not be penalized (to do so would be narrow-minded and evil). However, when someone substitues "u" f ...[text shortened]... some time to writing them. Also, I believe that the 'post count' should be done away with.
what about a way to alert a user, and anytime that person posts something it doesnt show up until a modrater acepts it?
Originally posted by UncleAdamBy Jove I think he's got it!
I was thinking...
what about a way to alert a user, and anytime that person posts something it doesnt show up until a modrater acepts it?
That could work.
Once a user had abused their privileges, they get a warning, followed by subjecting them to having their posts to be approved by a mod.
Of course, someone would have to decide what constituted abuse, but I'm sure that's not much of a problem.
Originally posted by Vargit could be possibly all the mod's have a vote, or a vote here
By Jove I think he's got it!
That could work.
Once a user had abused their privileges, they get a warning, followed by subjecting them to having their posts to be approved by a mod.
Of course, someone would have to decide what constituted abuse, but I'm sure that's not much of a problem.
this could also work for new members to stop muti accounts
Originally posted by CFCThe truth is that it doesn't really matter what is in your posts. Some of them are good posts, but many are not. I doesn't matter. What matters is that you've made about fifty posts since Monday morning. Nobody is interested enough in what you have to say to sit there and read 25 posts a day. It's too much. If you just made fewer posts, you could say whatever you want and no one would give you a hard time. Even arrogant jerks like myself would leave you alone.
1.Maybe
2.Maybe
3.I didn't understand a post.
4.Maybe
5.Maybe
π :'(
CFC, this isn't a chat room. If you don't understand a post by someone, and the post wasn't directed at you, then how about WAITING until other people join the conversation and pick up the meaning from them.
Incidently, if you actually believed the majority of the people here would jump on your side, well....perhaps you should take up monopoly.
Originally posted by geniusThat's still not spam.
a "maybe" is a yes-if you are in any doubt as to wheter it's spam, it is! (well-maybe not all the time, but -erm- well, yeah...π)
and if you don't understand a post, say what you don't understand about it, not just "Eh???????????????????????????????"
Originally posted by LivingLegendThat's what I do and others still have a go at me.π
That is totally true and I couldn't agree with you more but I think if we are using that kinda programs a lot we get used to it so instead of that we easily explain what we don't understand as a normal person...we say: eeeeeeh? what do you mean? We make it all a bit shorter so we don't have to typ so muchπ But afcourse, as I said you are right and I ...[text shortened]... se I will only post useful posts with a decent text (I gotta make CFC promise that toπ)
Olav
Originally posted by CFCyes it is, why dont you say something like
That's still not spam.
"I'm not sure what that means, could you explain it please?"
as opose to "Eh????????????????????" or "WHAT?!?!"
btw knowing you youring probly going to say that you dont have the time, but if you have enof time to write andot 20 "?"s then you do have the time, if you still dont have the time whay do you post as that takes up alot of time to.
I can't believe there has been such a fuss about this. Now, if it was a flamer I could understand. If someone had been found to be cheating, I could understand. But simple spam? Did anyone try sending either of these guys a private message politely explaining things to them? For that matter, is it really so hard to ignore the tiny posts and just scroll down? I'm not even going to go into what I think of the whole "lets implement more restrictions" subject. π
Originally posted by UncleAdamIt still isn't spam although I could've put in another way.
yes it is, why dont you say something like
"I'm not sure what that means, could you explain it please?"
as opose to "Eh????????????????????" or "WHAT?!?!"
btw knowing you youring probly going to say that you dont have the time, but if you have enof time to write andot 20 "?"s then you do have the time, if you still dont have the time whay do you post as that takes up alot of time to.
Originally posted by OmnislashYes they did send a private message. When I received that I stopped but others continued.
I can't believe there has been such a fuss about this. Now, if it was a flamer I could understand. If someone had been found to be cheating, I could understand. But simple spam? Did anyone try sending either of these guys a private message politely explaining things to them? For that matter, is it really so hard to ignore the tiny posts and just scroll do ...[text shortened]... even going to go into what I think of the whole "lets implement more restrictions" subject. π
Originally posted by OmnislashI dissagree with the limit also
I can't believe there has been such a fuss about this. Now, if it was a flamer I could understand. If someone had been found to be cheating, I could understand. But simple spam? Did anyone try sending either of these guys a private message politely explaining things to them? For that matter, is it really so hard to ignore the tiny posts and just scroll do ...[text shortened]... even going to go into what I think of the whole "lets implement more restrictions" subject. π
and I guess we have been makeing a big fuss about it, it never got this big with Zach918