01 Nov 11
6 edits
Originally posted by skeeteroh dear, perhaps you can point to the reference where i stated that
'Ooops' indeed. Poor wee Robbie, admits to using an engine and /or taking instruction from a third party using an engine to analyse games in progress as to the use of another engine ?? Yea right.
It's a 3(b) no matter which way it went and by his own posted words.
Byeeee.....
skeeter
1.I analysed a game using an engine while it was in progress
2.That i resigned because i suspected my opponent was using an engine
As for engine use, i dont think i would go there if i were you Skeety, it does rhyme
after all with Pumpkin eaty! You do enjoy a bit of Pumpkin, dont you Skeety. What did
you go , 'trick or treating' as Skeety, yourself?
01 Nov 11
1 edit
Too little too late. 'Screen print' is a wonderful feature and I've attatched mine in an email to admin. No doubt others besides Kegge saw it also before you edited it, and came to the same conclusion. Gone baby gone and no amount of denial or lying will get around the fact that you posted what was clearly a breach of 3(b)
skeeter
01 Nov 11
1 edit
Originally posted by skeeterOh really, perhaps you would like to stick it beside your little yellow post it of deep in
Too little too late. 'Screen print' is a wonderful feature and I've attatched mine in an email to admin. No doubt others besides kebbe saw it also before you edited it, and came to the same conclusion. Gone baby gone and no amount of denial or lying will get around the fact that you posted what was clearly a breach of 3(b)
skeeter
game analysis of check all checks, or lick it and slap it to your forehead. I have the
analysis of the player who analysed my game for me after it was finished, in fact,
several weeks after it was finished, should the administration of the site be interested
in why i came to the conclusions that I did, I will be happy to submit both the findings
and the analysis of the respected 2100+ player. I am sure the administration will find
such empirical evidence more substantial than the havering of an unstable and
deluded internet persona.
01 Nov 11
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSquirming will get you nowhere. Be a big boy or girl and own up.
ooops? did you slip on a banana, get hit by a falling piano, believe every piece of trash
talk that you read on the net? you feel your bum as well or get someone else to do it
for you, Kegge I am sure would be happy to oblige.
And grab your own backside while you're at it.
.
01 Nov 11
2 edits
Originally posted by HandyAndyI have nothing to squirm about, if you wish to file a complaint, then tell it to the site
Squirming will get you nowhere. Be a big boy or girl and own up.
And grab your own backside while you're at it.
.
administration, i am sure they will be more than happy to consider your
unsubstantiated claims and phlegmatic drivelling. Who knows, someone might care.
01 Nov 11
Originally posted by HandyAndyhaha, the vultures circle and little ol Robbie faces them alone, deep within the shadow
Good point.
of death, will our intrepid Viking hero stem the tide of phlegm, safe with the sacred
pronouncements of his chess mentor safe in hand, find out in next weeks exciting
episodes of skeety and her minions, more bull than a ranch of Texan Longhorns.
01 Nov 11
Originally posted by skeeterJeeeeesus.. GET A LIFE !!!!!!
Too little too late. 'Screen print' is a wonderful feature and I've attatched mine in an email to admin. No doubt others besides Kegge saw it also before you edited it, and came to the same conclusion. Gone baby gone and no amount of denial or lying will get around the fact that you posted what was clearly a breach of 3(b)
skeeter
- Joined
- 23 Nov 09
- Moves
- 140220
01 Nov 11
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI am not the one who wrote your post. I don't give a flying f whether you use an engine or not. I just pointed out you wrote you resigned a game after you knew (or were told) your opponent used an engine. Draw your own cloclusions.
Feel your bum or get Andy Pandy to do it, i heard he/she is very handy.
01 Nov 11
2 edits
Originally posted by Keggeyeah two weeks after the game was finished and I was told you zoob! in fact i even
I am not the one who wrote your post. I don't give a flying f whether you use an engine or not. I just pointed out you wrote you resigned a game [b]after you knew (or were told) your opponent used an engine. Draw your own cloclusions.[/b]
started another game with the user after the first one, meaning that i had no idea
whether they were or were not an engine user, doing what to your stupid little theory?
that is correct draw your own cartoons! and get a spell checker while your at it or join
the slackers club. I resent your assertions of engine use and i will report these to the
administration.
- Joined
- 23 Nov 09
- Moves
- 140220
01 Nov 11
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo, you admit you had third party help to decide whether you would resign the game. You are very confusing Robbie.
yeah two weeks after I was told you zoob! draw your own cartoons!
It is simple. You wrote that you resigned a game AFTER you found out your opponent used an engine. There are only two ways you could know this:
1. you yourself used an engine to analyse the game
2. A third party used an engine and assisted you with your decision to resign the game..
In both situations an ongoing game was analysed and after the result was know you resigned a game. This is in breach with the CoS.
Correct?