@fmf saidWe know how you treat posters you disagree with. This pushback is an attempt to keep you from becoming unleashed on innocent bystanders. And yes, we get how you rank things by importance in your mind. "Me, me, me, me, me and me."
Anonymous red thumbs are just inane meaningless social media fluff. They do not rank, in my mind, as grown-up "disagreement, dissent and criticism".
22 May 22
@suzianne saidI think this is a mischaracterization of my contribution to these forums.
We know how you treat posters you disagree with. This pushback is an attempt to keep you from becoming unleashed on innocent bystanders. And yes, we get how you rank things by importance in your mind. "Me, me, me, me, me and me."
22 May 22
@divegeester saidA meaningful result? Of course. Unlike what you did.
I’d get someone competent to run it if if were you.
Let’s keep doing it until we get the result you want.
22 May 22
@divegeester saidGo ahead, keep speaking in trivialities.
I suggest you take your complain to Moonbus.
Hey maybe start a club called “Remainers”!
22 May 22
@fmf saidThe poll was buried almost instantly, I'm sure. That is why no one saw it.
So much for "keeping track of this subject". You posted on the thread about this subject several times after the poll was started and before it expired.
Did you PM to your comrades the exact page number it was on?
Of course you did.
@suzianne saidPresumably "they" refers to one-day chess games. I think they are for people who want to play one-day games. I don't see how that is infantile or how the option to have one-day games is an infantile facility. Indeed it is a positive feature. I don't see any valid comparison with anonymous thumbs.
I believe they exist for one purpose. For people to earn wins based on their opponent's inaction and not on their own skill.Cheap wins are infantile, yes.