The Popular Group

@suzianne said
Trying far too hard.

The point is, it wasn't a "tempest in a teapot". It was something real from "life away from here".

@suzianne said
How much of the blame lies with you?

How much of the blame lies with me for someone going behind my back and getting the radio programmes taken down? None. A message asking me to change the pseudonym would have resulted in the pseudonym being changed.

@suzianne said
As I said, you're trying far too hard.

Have you listened to any of the programmes?

@divegeester said
I’m not the person who tried to sabotage a radio programme because their name was read out differently on he radio (in line with common practice for multiple contributions from a single person).

I’m not the one who stated a crappy thread whining about it, telling lies, implicating ME (!!) and facilitating what you are so fond of accusing others of “character assassina ...[text shortened]... being lectured by you, the RHP fantasist, about “real life” makes me want to wet my pants laughing.

No, I understand you must keep your narrative going, but fantasy seems your forte, not mine. Your "reality" is far, far more "fantastical" than mine.

My only mistake (apparently) is telling the truth.

Your problem is that you think popularity is a zero-sum game. You think it comes through tearing down others. It only takes self-realization, instead of self-idealization. Add a dose of determinism and subtract your vanity, and success is assured. Give it a try sometime.

@fmf said
How much of the blame lies with me for someone going behind my back and getting the radio programmes taken down? None. A message asking me to change the pseudonym would have resulted in the pseudonym being changed.

Oh, here we go.

@suzianne said
Oh, here we go.

You asked me. And I answered. Do you have some other version of what happened?

@fmf said
You asked me. And I answered. Do you have some other version of what happened?

You've heard "other versions" and you've blown them off.

And sorry, but your "answering" is always, always, done through your lens of self-promotion. This makes what you say suspect. Too bad you've never been able to see that.

Nothing more needs to be said.

@suzianne said
You've heard "other versions" and you've blown them off.

The story is about me and my radio programme getting temporarily taken off the air. I have no reason to lie about it.

@suzianne said
And sorry, but your "answering" is always, always, done through your lens of self-promotion.

I disagree with this characterization of me defending myself. I have read every post in that thread "A Trifling Matter" and the number of untrue things about me and the making of the radio programme that were asserted there or things were asserted - plucked out of thin air - by people that had no idea what they were talking about - but not corrected - is bizarre and creepy. I have read every post in that thread "A Trifling Matter". My response to it cannot be described as "self-promotion".

@fmf said
How much of the blame lies with me for someone going behind my back and getting the radio programmes taken down? None. A message asking me to change the pseudonym would have resulted in the pseudonym being changed.

The blame? All of it. You failed to get my permission. You used a childish spoonerism of my real name (immediately identifiable as me) not a pseudonym. (And at that time had 'only' done that with my stories). You did this out of spite after we fell out in the forums. It was broadcast on live radio where my family were listening and who were confused why you 'couldn't even get my name right.' You did it because you were begrudgingly broadcasting my stories having already put in the effort of recording them and wanting to fill the show. Messing with my name was the only thing you had left to poke me with. Have you forgotten all this or pushed it to the back of your memory? You did the one thing you shouldn't do as the host of a show, betray the trust of one of the contributors.

Oh, and you had ignored my 2 previous attempts to message you. Why on Earth would I waste my time messaging you again? In life I am slow to act, but when I do act I'm all in, no half measures. I ignored it the first time you changed my name, but when it happened again the following week, I acted decisively. I would do so again.

@suzianne said
No, I understand you must keep your narrative going, but fantasy seems your forte, not mine. Your "reality" is far, far more "fantastical" than mine.

Oh really...

So my claims that Ghost of a Duke dishonesty implicated me into his beef with FMF is as wild a “fantasy” as you..

- Claiming to have to have been visited by angels
- Claiming to have been abducted for two years
- Claiming to have saved “countless” lives on the streets using CPR
- Claiming to have frequented biker bars to lure them into sexually molesting you and you then crashing them through “countless” bar tables .... using mixed martial arts
- Claiming you were considering buying 650cc sports motorcycle, when you’ve never even ridden one before, let alone passed your text

That’s what your now claiming ?

@suzianne said
My only mistake (apparently) is telling the truth.

Oh sure, all that in my post above is “truth”.

You are so full of it you actually believe the fantasies you post about yourself.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
In life I am slow to act, but when I do act I'm all in, no half measures.

Completely over the top measures, spilling over into paranoid delusions and lashing out at me when I had nothing to do with it. You completely misjudged the situation and blew your lid. Anger issues I suspect.

And why...because you were upset with FMF because he questioned your (non existent) medical credentials and silly appeals to your own authority in your spat with him.

Ego is a dangerous thing, especially for people so tightly wrapped they “never lose their temper” ... but oh boy when you lose yours you really lose it!

Edit... and jeez, you actually got your family to sit down with you and listen to your stories being read out on the radio.
Oh dear.

@divegeester said
Completely over the top measures, spilling over into paranoid delusions and lashing out at me when I had nothing to do with it. You completely misjudged the situation and blew your lid. Anger issues I suspect.

And why...because you were upset with FMF because he questioned your (non existent) medical credentials and silly appeals to your own authority in your spat wit ...[text shortened]... your family to sit down with you and listen to your stories being read out on the radio.
Oh dear.

Members of my family live in Colchester where the show is broadcast. It is their local radio station and yes, are supportive in that way of any projects I have on the go.

God bless family.