@earl-of-trumps saidI’m aware that I’ve been busting your balls a bit lately Trumpy but do settle down, no one cares what your best day in Ghost’s crappy little club was. Least of all me.
@divegeester
The nicest day I have had in the Ghost Chamber was when you were shown the door.
Screw.
Of course you might pull a few green thumbs from your clique with quality virtue-signalling like that!
@earl-of-trumps saidEarl,
@divegeester
The nicest day I have had in the Ghost Chamber was when you were shown the door.
Screw.
Are you getting in tight with the little group now? 😉
Do you get points or something every time you say something negative about fmf or Dive?
-VR
@divegeester saidHardly bias-free, innit?
Not really, I showed it to him at the time.
A sort of “can you friggin’ believe this?” convo.
@divegeester saidGiven his bias against me, and the fact that he knows less than nothing about me, due to his biased beliefs, what could FMF be saying to anyone "in private, in the strictest confidence" about me?
Did you ever repeat something FMF said to you in private, and given its sensitive nature, it was said to you in the strictest confidence, about Suzianne, did you ever casually mention this, regardless, in public?
The mind boggles. I'd say it would either be a lie or a threat, and as FMF has said in the past, and I'm sure he'd agree, that this renders the privacy of such a statement invalid.
@suzianne saidwhat could FMF be saying to anyone "in private, in the strictest confidence" about me?
Given his bias against me, and the fact that he knows less than nothing about me, due to his biased beliefs, what could FMF be saying to anyone "in private, in the strictest confidence" about me?
It was neither a "lie" nor a "threat". It was an opinion that I shared in confidence and which I would only have shared with a friend whom I trusted and would never have dreamed of sharing in publuc.
@suzianne saidNo it’s true. What was said in private by FMF was later shared in public by Ghost of a Duke.
Given his bias against me, and the fact that he knows less than nothing about me, due to his biased beliefs, what could FMF be saying to anyone "in private, in the strictest confidence" about me?
The mind boggles. I'd say it would either be a lie or a threat, and as FMF has said in the past, and I'm sure he'd agree, that this renders the privacy of such a statement invalid.
What was said was said based on things you post about yourself in these forums and required no other knowledge.
There is no need for any mind-boggling or any paranoia as you will have read what ghost of a duke repeated in public at the time. There would be little surprise by you and no need to attribute the repeated comment to “bias” or “lies”.
It’s the principle which is at stake here, the principle which ghost of a duke has brought up in a complainy way about me repeating the exchange between you and I about you buying a motorcycle.
I wonder if this little side-drama might be an example for the hypocrisy thread.
@divegeester saidWas this before or after FMF spilled the beans about the notes you guys keep about RHP regulars in your creepy little private club?
No it’s true. What was said in private by FMF was later shared in public by Ghost of a Duke.
What was said was said based on things you post about yourself in these forums and required no other knowledge.
There is no need for any mind-boggling or any paranoia as you will have read what ghost of a duke repeated in public at the time. There would be little surprise ...[text shortened]... g a motorcycle.
I wonder if this little side-drama might be an example for the hypocrisy thread.
You don't know what actual principle is. You think it's just people not liking you.
So FMF's "opinion" is part of the hype. Who knew?
@divegeester saidAs I have said numerous times, the way Suzianne uses the word hypocrite incorrectly over and over again, suggests that she doesn't really know what it means, which means, in turn, that she may not have much of value to contribute to a thread on hypocrisy.
I wonder if this little side-drama might be an example for the hypocrisy thread.
@suzianne saidWhat a lazy post this piece by you is. Of course I know what principle is. I also know what hypocrisy is, and neither have anything to do with people not liking me.
You don't know what actual principle is. You think it's just people not liking you.
So FMF's "opinion" is part of the hype. Who knew?
@suzianne saidHave you ever confronted Ghost of a Duke about how you think his discussion group with me and divegeester was a "creepy little private club"? I don't think I remember divegeester or Ghost of a Duke ever saying anything "creepy" in our conversations there, and nor am I a poster who says "creepy" things.
Was this before or after FMF spilled the beans about the notes you guys keep about RHP regulars in your creepy little private club?
@fmf saidIt is still a creepy, private club that makes and keeps notes on RHP users, and not surprisingly, Ghost of a Duke is no longer there.
Have you ever confronted Ghost of a Duke about how you think his discussion group with me and divegeester was a "creepy little private club"? I don't think I remember divegeester or Ghost of a Duke ever saying anything "creepy" in our conversations there, and nor am I a poster who says "creepy" things.
10 Apr 21
@fmf saidHave you ever seen Suzie Q confront goad about anything? If you have I'd love for you to point it out to me. 😉
Have you ever confronted Ghost of a Duke about how you think his discussion group with me and divegeester was a "creepy little private club"? I don't think I remember divegeester or Ghost of a Duke ever saying anything "creepy" in our conversations there, and nor am I a poster who says "creepy" things.
-VR
@divegeester saidOh, examine it for a minute. Examine those you say have "no principle". Examine those you call "hypocrites".
What a lazy post this piece by you is. Of course I know what principle is. I also know what hypocrisy is, and neither have anything to do with people not liking me.
They don't like you, and this throws cold water on your supposition that they are "hypocrites" or that they have "no principle".
This could be explained by you having no idea what hypocrisy or principle means.
What I said stands.