25 Sep 05
1 edit
Originally posted by chancremechanicYou cant prevent a hurricane from happening. But you can prevent a war.
Yeah, and the next heat wave that kills 40,000 elderly Europeans, no matter that the majority were French, as it did a couple of years ago, or a major flooding event takes place where you live, remember your stupid remark to Vulture, @ss-munch.....go visit an American soldier's cemetary in your pathetic little hole-in-the-ground country (below sea level?) and ask for an apology......dickhead!
Anyone who voted for bush into his second term is responisble for mass murder.
By the way this hole in the ground was one of the first countries to offer help when katrina struck and your oh so superior country couldnt take care of itself.
Maybe its also interesting for you to know that patriot is just and english word for NAZI.
26 Sep 05
Originally posted by LordOfTheChessboardMy country is taking care of itself just fine without your country's 'token' act of generosity...what was it? blankets and some tents? Americans will always take care themsleves. I didn't vote for Bush, so that aquits me of your stupid accusation.
You cant prevent a hurricane from happening. But you can prevent a war.
Anyone who voted for bush into his second term is responisble for mass murder.
By the way this hole in the ground was one of the first countries to offer help when katrina struck and your oh so superior country couldnt take care of itself.
Maybe its also interesting for you to know that patriot is just and english word for NAZI.
I't will probably interest you to know that you wouldn't know a patriot if he kicked you in the ass...and the true defintion of the word was probably taken out of the Dutch dictionary after WW2; don't forget the 50,000+ American soldiers and airmen currently 'protecting' your 'oh so impotent' country at this very momemt. The word that replaced "patriot" for you people was "concede" instead of fight for your freedom...how pathetic!!
26 Sep 05
Originally posted by chancremechanicAre you seriously saying that the Dutch army could withstand the onslaught of the German army?
My country is taking care of itself just fine without your country's 'token' act of generosity...what was it? blankets and some tents? Americans will always take care themsleves. I didn't vote for Bush, so that aquits me of your stupid accusation.
I't will probably interest you to know that you wouldn't know a patriot if he kicked you in th ...[text shortened]... ed "patriot" for you people was "concede" instead of fight for your freedom...how pathetic!!
They lasted 3 days....
The Dutch hardly had an army back then and the German's had the most advanced army in the world.
Ironically though, the Dutch resistance to the German occupation has always been deemed "a force for good" and the Iraqi resistance to the US occupation is deemed "an insurgancy of evil".
😉
26 Sep 05
Originally posted by chancremechanicI've had this long winded arguement about patriotism with you before. What you have would more likely be considered retardation.
My country is taking care of itself just fine without your country's 'token' act of generosity...what was it? blankets and some tents? Americans will always take care themsleves. I didn't vote for Bush, so that aquits me of your stupid accusation.
I't will probably interest you to know that you wouldn't know a patriot if he kicked you in th ...[text shortened]... ed "patriot" for you people was "concede" instead of fight for your freedom...how pathetic!!
27 Sep 05
Originally posted by shavixmirNo, I'm saying that Lord of the chessboards hateful remark about looking at the brightside of a hurricane hitting Houston and killing Americans is counter-productive in the face of thousands of Americans who were killed freeing Holland during WW2 in the face of a "Hurricane" named Hitler. If the insurgency that wants a Taliban-Iran type government isn't evil or stoneaged, what would you call it? Incidentally, a dictator on the level of Hitler was removed in the process....would that be called an invasion of "good"? The US will leave once Iraq is a democracy able to stand on it own feet...much as Holland does...what's so evil about that?
Are you seriously saying that the Dutch army could withstand the onslaught of the German army?
They lasted 3 days....
The Dutch hardly had an army back then and the German's had the most advanced army in the world.
Ironically though, the Dutch resistance to the German occupation has always been deemed "a force for good" and the Iraqi resistance to the US occupation is deemed "an insurgancy of evil".
😉
27 Sep 05
1 edit
Originally posted by chancremechanicBesides the obvious fact that it was the US that got Saddam into power and financed him for decades?
No, I'm saying that Lord of the chessboards hateful remark about looking at the brightside of a hurricane hitting Houston and killing Americans is counter-productive in the face of thousands of Americans who were killed freeing Holland during WW2 in the face of a "Hurricane" named Hitler. If the insurgency that wants a Taliban-Iran type governmen ...[text shortened]... is a democracy able to stand on it own feet...much as Holland does...what's so evil about that?
I'd say interfering with the internal affairs of another country is evil.
Yes, in general we both may agree that Saddam was a very nasty piece of work. But who are we?
Look at the US's regimes in Vietnam, Cambodia, the SOA in Georgia, the US embargo on Cuba, America's 3 billion a year to the Israeli arms industry, the US's attack on Afghanistan. These are all things I find evil.
Should I start a war on the US?
And if so, considering I'm not a super power, how should I go about it?
What goes around comes around Chancremechanic. When your country preaches hatred (remember the axis of evil speach) and tries to control other countries by brute force (whether that's sanctions, weapons or threats) then you can't expect to get anything fair in return.
Don't forget, everybody who matters in current day affairs was born after WWII.
Yes. It was nice of the US to help Europe out. But at the risk of sounding slightly cynical: The US did very well trades wise from it. Britain was in debt to the US until Clinton's administration. And I've not seen the US weapons lobby avoid a chance of war yet. Nothing like a good, old fashioned battle to get the financial juices a-rollin'.
27 Sep 05
Originally posted by shavixmirYou got it the wrong way round Shav. 'Twas OBL who financed Dubya and his pops...weakening the Great Satan from the inside,so to speak. The Saudis have the Yanks in their pockets...
Besides the obvious fact that it was the US that got Saddam into power and financed him for decades?